Rajasthan High Court
CW/10610/2026 of SUNITA YADAV WIFE OF SHRI VIJAY SINGH YADAV Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 20 July 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10610/2026 URN: CW / 23401U / 2026 Sunita Yadav Wife of Shri Vijay Singh Yadav, Aged About 53 Years, Resident of D-1, Hasan Khan Mewati Nagar, Alwar (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary To
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10610/2026
URN: CW / 23401U / 2026
Sunita Yadav Wife of Shri Vijay Singh Yadav, Aged About 53
Years, Resident of D-1, Hasan Khan Mewati Nagar, Alwar (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
State of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary To The Government, School Education Department, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2.
Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner (Raj.)
3.
The District Education Officer (Headquarter), Secondary, Alwar, Rajasthan.
4.
Principal, Government Senior Secondary School, Kakrali Mev, Alwar (Raj.)
5.
Shri Rajesh Kumar Jain, Principal Government Senior Secondary School, Dudaberi, Barmer.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Dinesh Yadav
For Respondent(s)
:
Ms. Pooja Sharma, AAAG
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
20/07/2026 Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that in view of the order dated 13.02.2026 passed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19890/2025(Sunita Yadav Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.), the Director, Secondary Education Rajasthan, Bikaner has issued a notice dated 16.07.2026 to the petitioner to appear before them on 22.07.2026 for personal hearing so as to ensure the compliance of said order. Counsel appearing for the petitioner does not dispute the fact of issuance of aforesaid notice.
(2 of 3) [CW-10610/2026] Vide order dated 13.02.2026, the writ petition was disposed of with liberty to the respondents to pass fresh order of transfer after giving due opportunity of hearing to both, the petitioner as well as respondent No.5 and after examining the administrative exigency as well as eligibility to hold post by both the parties. Counsel for the petitioner has made a limited prayer that the respondents may be directed to take appropriate decision and pass a fresh order in compliance of the order 13.02.2026 irrespective of any subsequent order passed prior to issuance of the present notice which is under challenge in the present writ petition. Counsel appearing for the respondents submit that in view of the notice issued to the petitioner by Office of the Director, Secondary Education Rajasthan, Bikaner, they will pass a fresh order regarding transfer of the petitioner as well as the respondent No.5-Rajesh Kumar Jain after hearing both the parties and after examining the administrative exigency as well as their eligibility to hold post by both the parties. In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed of. The respondents in view of the notice dated 16.07.2026 read with order dated 13.02.2026 passed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19890/2025 would be at liberty to pass fresh order regarding transfer of the petitioner as well as private respondent No.5 without being influenced or effected by any other order passed earlier.
(3 of 3) [CW-10610/2026] The respondents shall take the decision and pass fresh transfer order as early as possible preferably within a period of 30 days. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J YOGESH KUMAR/22