Rajasthan High Court
HC/218/2026 of ARCHANA WIFE OF JITENDRA, DAUGHTER OF SHRI NARSINGH Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 20 July 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No. 218/2026 URN: HC / 598U / 2026 Archana Wife Of Jitendra, Daughter Of Shri Narsingh, Aged About 26 Years, Resident Of Plot No. 11, Samola, Police Station Aravali Vihar, Alwar, At Present Resident Of Village Shahbad, Police
[2026:RJ-JP:27588-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No. 218/2026
URN: HC / 598U / 2026
Archana Wife Of Jitendra, Daughter Of Shri Narsingh, Aged About 26 Years, Resident Of Plot No. 11, Samola, Police Station Aravali Vihar, Alwar, At Present Resident Of Village Shahbad, Police Station And Tehsil Tijara, District Khairthal- Tijara (Raj.)
(Mother Of Abducted Minor Aarti Bawaria)
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
State Of Rajasthan, Through Home Secretary, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.).
2.
Director General Of Police, Police Headquarter, Jaipur (Raj.).
3.
Additional Director General Of Police, Anti Human Trafficking, Unit Jaipur (Raj.)
4.
Superintendent Of Police, Bhiwadi, District Bhiwadi (Raj.)
5.
S.h.o. Of Police Station Tijara, District Bhiwadi (Raj.).
6.
Jitendra Son Of Baljeet, Resident Of Plot No. 11, Samola, Police Station Aravali Vihar, Alwar (Raj.)
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Ghanshyam Dass
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA-cum-AAG
with
Mr. Aman Agarwal
Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma
Ms. Neha Goyal
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
20/07/2026 After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw this habeas corpus petition as he has
[2026:RJ-JP:27588-DB] (2 of 2) [HC-218/2026] instructions to avail the appropriate remedy available under the law for redressal of her grievance(s). The habeas corpus petition is dismissed accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (RAVI CHIRANIA),J (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J 45-s/DIKSHA