Rajasthan High Court

HC/237/2026 of UMA PACHAURI W/O SHRI KAILASH CHAND PACHAURI Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 20 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No. 237/2026 URN: HC / 653U / 2026 Uma Pachauri W/o Shri Kailash Chand Pachauri, Age About 75 Years, Resident Of 61/23, Rajat Path, Mansarovar, Jaipur, Rajasthan- 302020. ----Petitioner/Complainant Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan,

[2026:RJ-JP:27645-DB]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No. 237/2026

URN: HC / 653U / 2026

Uma Pachauri W/o Shri Kailash Chand Pachauri, Age About 75

Years, Resident Of 61/23, Rajat Path, Mansarovar, Jaipur, Rajasthan- 302020.

----Petitioner/Complainant

Versus

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department Of Home Affairs, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)

2. Police

Commissioner,

Police

Commissionerate, Government Hostel, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

3. Deputy Commissioner Of Police (South), Jaipur South, Police Commissionerate, Jaipur.

4. Station House Officer, Police Station Mansarovar, Jaipur South, Varun Path, Jaipur, Rajasthan- 302020. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA cum AAG with Mr. Aman Agarwal Ms. Neha Goyal Mr. Vinod Sharma Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, P.P. Mr. Sattar Ali, ASI, P.S. Ramganjmandi, District Kota HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA Judgment / Order 20/07/2026 Pursuant to order of this Court dated 18.07.2026, learned Government Advocate cum Additional Advocate General has submitted the status report dated 19.07.2026 furnished by the

[2026:RJ-JP:27645-DB] (2 of 2) [HC-237/2026] Deputy Superintendent of Police, Circle Ramganjmandi, District Kota Rural. As per the report, Ms. "S.S."-daughter of the petitioner was never taken in illegal detention/custody rather, was called for investigation. It is further stated that she has been and is with her family members. None for the petitioner even in the second round. Taking into consideration the contents of the status report dated 19.07.2026, we do not find it to be a case of illegal detention. Resultantly, this habeas corpus petition is dismissed. (RAVI CHIRANIA),J (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J 43/Manish

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead