Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/9953/2026 of MOSIM HUSAIN S/O JAKIR Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 17 July 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 9953/2026 URN: CRLMB / 18451U / 2026 Mosim Husain S/o Jakir, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Ward No. 19, Nayi Abadi Botalganj, Police Station Pipaliya Mandi, Distt. Mandsaur (Madhya Pradesh). (At Present
[2026:RJ-JP:27335]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 9953/2026
URN: CRLMB / 18451U / 2026
Mosim Husain S/o Jakir, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Ward No. 19, Nayi Abadi Botalganj, Police Station Pipaliya Mandi, Distt.
Mandsaur (Madhya Pradesh). (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined Sub Jail Malpura).
----Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan, through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Ms. Raj Bala
For Respondent(s)
:
Ms. Arti Sharma, Public Prosecutor
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
17/07/2026
1. The instant second bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 on behalf of accused-petitioner in connection with FIR No.127/2025 registered at Police Station Lambaharisingh, District Tonk for the offences under Sections 3, 5, 6 and & of the Rajasthan Bovine Animal (Prohibition of Slaughter and Regulation of Temporary Migration or Export) Act, 1995 and Section 11(1)(D) of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960.
2. Heard.
3. Considered the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material made available on record.
[2026:RJ-JP:27335] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-9953/2026]
4. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 09.11.2025 and the trial of the case is likely to take considerable time. She further submits that the co-accused of the present case has already been enlarged on bail by the this Court on 22.05.2026 (S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.7121/2026.
5. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail application.
6. Having regard to the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner and taking into consideration the allegation against the accused-petitioner and the fact that he is in custody since 09.11.2025, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits or demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.
7. Accordingly, the second bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner named above shall be enlarged on bail provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- together with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J 5/Ashish Kumar