Rajasthan High Court

CW/12049/2026 of BALWAN SINGH SAINI S/O MEGHRAJ SAINI Vs VARDHMAN MAHAVEER OPEN UNIVERSITY on 17 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12049/2026 URN: CW / 26607U / 2026 Balwan Singh Saini S/o Meghraj Saini, Aged About 51 Years, R/o Plot No. A5/22, Garden City, Jaipur Jodhpur Byepass, Near Mn Institute, Naino Ka Bas, Bikaner, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus

[2026:RJ-JP:27507]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12049/2026

URN: CW / 26607U / 2026

Balwan Singh Saini S/o Meghraj Saini, Aged About 51 Years, R/o Plot No. A5/22, Garden City, Jaipur Jodhpur Byepass, Near Mn Institute, Naino Ka Bas, Bikaner, Rajasthan.

----Petitioner

Versus

1.

Vardhman Mahaveer Open University, Kota Through Its Registrar.

2.

The Secretary, Kulguru Sachivalaya, Vardhman Mahaveer Open University, Kota.

3.

The Director, Regional Services Division, Vardhman Mahaveer Open University, Bikaner.

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Ram Pratap Saini

For Respondent(s)

:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Order

17/07/2026

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing at some length made a limited prayer that the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation to the competent respondent-authority as regards his genuine problems on account of transfer from Regional Centre, Bikaner to Regional Centre, Jodhpur.

2. In view of the prayer made by the counsel for the petitioner, the Court deems just and proper to allow the petitioner to make a representation as regards his grievances to the competent authority within a period of three days.

[2026:RJ-JP:27507] (2 of 2) [CW-12049/2026]

3. In case, any such representation is received by the respondents from the petitioner within a given period of three days, then the same may be considered and appropriate decision be taken as early as possible.

4. In case, the petitioner files the representation within the given period of three days, he shall be allowed to continue at Bikaner till disposal of the writ petition by the respondents.

5. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of.

6. Stay application as well as pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J 43/SHRUTI SHARMA

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead