Rajasthan High Court
CW/11791/2026 of JAGDISH PRASAD S/O SHRI TULSI RAM Vs THE RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION on 17 July 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11791/2026 URN: CW / 26089U / 2026 Jagdish Prasad S/o Shri Tulsi Ram, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Bijali Ghar Ke Pas, Pakka Talab, Kumher, Distt. Bharatpur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. The Rajasthan State Road Transport
[2026:RJ-JP:27423]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11791/2026
URN: CW / 26089U / 2026
Jagdish Prasad S/o Shri Tulsi Ram, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Bijali Ghar Ke Pas, Pakka Talab, Kumher, Distt. Bharatpur (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
The Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Chomu House, Parivahan Marg, Jaipur, Through Chairman Cum Managing Director (Raj.).
2.
The Executive Director (Admin), Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Chomu House, Jaipur (Rajasthan).
3.
The Chief Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Bharatpur Depot, District Bharatpur (Raj.).
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Ms. Mansi Singh
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
17/07/2026
1. Ms. Mansi Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would feel satisfied, if the respondent- Corporation is directed to consider petitioner’s representation in light of the Judgment dated 02.12.2021 rendered by the Division Bench of this Court in D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 524/2018 (The Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation & Anr. vs. Tara Chand), expeditiously in accordance with law.
2. The present writ petition is, therefore, disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to address a representation before the Competent Authority of the respondent-Corporation along with web copy of the judgment dated 02.12.2021 rendered in case of
[2026:RJ-JP:27423] (2 of 2) [CW-11791/2026] Tara Chand (supra) and the certified copy of the order instant within a period of four weeks.
3. In case, the representation is so addressed, the Competent Authority shall consider the same in accordance with law including the judgment passed in case of Tara Chand (supra), as early as possible, preferably within a period of three months from the receipt thereof.
4. It is made clear that aforesaid direction to decide the representation has been issued only with a view to ensure expeditious redressal of petitioner’s grievance. The same may not be construed to be an order to decide the representation in a particular manner.
5. The stay application also stands disposed of accordingly.
6. The order has been passed based on the submissions made in the petition, the respondents would be free to examine the veracity of the submissions made in the petition and only in case, the averments made therein are found to be correct, the petitioner would be entitled to the relief. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J 9/Ashish Kumar