Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/8713/2026 of LOKESH MEENA S/O SHRI SANWALRAM Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 16 July 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8713/2026 URN: CRLMB / 15960U / 2026 Lokesh Meena S/o Shri Sanwalram, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Naka Ki Dhani Sidouli, Police Station Ramgarh Pachwara, District Dausa, At Present Residing At Jagdish Bihar
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8713/2026
URN: CRLMB / 15960U / 2026
Lokesh Meena S/o Shri Sanwalram, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Naka Ki Dhani Sidouli, Police Station Ramgarh Pachwara, District Dausa, At Present Residing At Jagdish Bihar Colony Luniyawas, Police Station Jamdoli, District Jaipur East (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur).
----Accused-Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Rajveer Singh Gurjar
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
16/07/2026
1. The instant bail application has been filed against the order of learned Trial Court dated 26.05.2026 on behalf of the accused- petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 106/2026 registered at Police Station Kotkhawada, District Jaipur City (South) for the offence(s) punishable under Section 305(a) of B.N.S., 2023, wherein charge-sheet has been submitted under Sections 305(a) & 331(4) of B.N.S., 2023.
2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case; that the charge-sheet has been filed; that the accused-petitioner is in custody since long. He also submits that the alleged offences are triable by Magistrate; conclusion of trial will take its own time, so
(2 of 3) [CRLMB-8713/2026] no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused- petitioner behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the accused- petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the accused- petitioner hereinabove and submits that one another criminal case is registered against the accused-petitioner, therefore, the accused-petitioner may not be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 BNSS.
4. Heard and considered the submissions made at the Bar and perused the material available on record, the overall facts and circumstances of the case and the contentions put forth by learned counsel for both the parties; that the charge-sheet against the accused-petitioner has been filed; that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 13.05.2026; that the alleged offences are triable by Magistrate; that the co-accused person namely Rajat Soni has already been enlarged on bail by the Trial Court itself vide order dated 26.05.2026; that the trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused- petitioner on bail.
5. Therefore, the instant bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Lokesh Meena S/o Shri Sanwalram is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall
(3 of 3) [CRLMB-8713/2026] appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve himself in any offence(s) during currency of the bail.
7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned condition, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court.
8. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner.
9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court and Jail authorities through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J PUNEET KUMAR/33