Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/9071/2026 of AKHTAR SON OF SHRI SUGAN Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 16 July 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9071/2026 URN: CRLMB / 16622U / 2026 Akhtar Son Of Shri Sugan, Age About 38 Years, R/o Machdi, Police Station Akbarpur, District Alwar (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Alwar)
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9071/2026
URN: CRLMB / 16622U / 2026
Akhtar Son Of Shri Sugan, Age About 38 Years, R/o Machdi, Police Station Akbarpur, District Alwar (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Alwar)
----Accused-Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Ms. Swati
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
16/07/2026
1. The instant bail application has been filed against the order of learned Trial Court dated 29.05.2026 on behalf of the accused- petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 111/2026 registered at Police Station Akbarpur, District Alwar for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 318(2), 318(4), 61(2) and 112(2) of B.N.S., 2023 and Section 66D of IT Act.
2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case; that the accused-petitioner is in custody since long. He also submits that investigation is complete and the alleged offences are triable by Magistrate; conclusion of trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused-petitioner behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the accused-petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS.
(2 of 3) [CRLMB-9071/2026]
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the accused- petitioner hereinabove but concurs with the fact that there are no criminal antecedents registered against the accused-petitioner.
4. Heard and considered the submissions made at the Bar and perused the material available on record, the overall facts and circumstances of the case and the contentions put forth by learned counsel for both the parties; that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 21.05.2026; that the alleged offences are triable by Magistrate; that the co-accused person namely Tasleem has already been enlarged on bail by the Trial Court itself vide order dated 10.06.2026; that the trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused- petitioner on bail.
5. Therefore, the instant bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Akhtar Son Of Shri Sugan is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve himself in any offence(s) during currency of the bail.
7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned condition, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application
(3 of 3) [CRLMB-9071/2026] against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court.
8. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner.
9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court and Jail authorities through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J PUNEET KUMAR/36