Rajasthan High Court
CW/6450/2026 of MADAN LAL S/O SHRI DANARAM Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 16 July 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6450/2026 URN: CW / 14264U / 2026 Madan Lal S/o Shri Danaram, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Village Manasiya Post Jasrasar Tehsil Laxmangarh District Sikar (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6450/2026
URN: CW / 14264U / 2026
Madan Lal S/o Shri Danaram, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Village Manasiya Post Jasrasar Tehsil Laxmangarh District Sikar (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2.
The Secretary, Administrative Reforms Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
3.
The Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner, Rajasthan.
4.
The Principal, Government Senior Secondary School, Sola District Sikar.
5.
Kuldeep Singh, Principal, Govt. Senior Secondary School, Sola District Sikar.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Pradeep Mathur
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Vishal Kumar, AAAG
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
16/07/2026
1. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with a challenge to the order dated 22.09.2025 whereby, the petitioner who is working on the post of Principal at Govt. Senior Secondary School, Sola, District Sikar has been transferred to Govt. Senior Secondary School, Kotda R Jalore. He has also challenged the order dated 01.04.2026 whereby, the representation submitted by
(2 of 3) [CW-6450/2026] the petitioner as regards his grievances towards his impugned transfer order has been rejected.
2. Heard.
3. Considered the submissions made by counsel for the parties.
4. The petitioner is working on the post of Principal at Government Senior Secondary School and he is a Government servant as defined Sub-section (c) of Section 2 of the Rajasthan Civil Services (Service Matters Appellate Tribunals) Act, 1976 (hereinafter to be referred as “the Act of 1976”),
5. The petitioner by way of the present writ petition has challenged the order of transfer and so also rejection of representation earlier to the transfer. The subject transfer has been included in the definition of ‘service matter’ as given in Sub-section (f) of Section 2 of the Act of 1976.
6. Section 4 of the Act of 1976 provides for remedy of appeal before the Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal against the order passed by any officer or authority on any service matter or matters affecting a Government servant in his personal capacity.
7. In view of the provisions, the petitioner is having an alternative remedy of appeal before the Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal so as to order of his transfer and so also against rejection of his representation. Since the petitioner is having statutory alternative remedy of appeal, this Court is not inclined to exercise power conferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India directly without availing remedy of appeal.
8. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed.
(3 of 3) [CW-6450/2026]
9. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to avail remedy of appeal before the Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal.
10. Stay application as well as pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J 10/Ashish Kumar