Rajasthan High Court

CW/10825/2026 of ROSHANI KUMARI D/O PRABHU RAM Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 15 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10825/2026 URN: CW / 24020U / 2026 1. Roshani Kumari D/o Prabhu Ram, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Village Post- Mehrana, Post Office- Chhani Bari, Tehsil- Bhadra, District- Hanumangarh, Rajasthan-335511 (Application No. -

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10825/2026

URN: CW / 24020U / 2026

1.

Roshani Kumari D/o Prabhu Ram, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Village Post- Mehrana, Post Office- Chhani Bari, Tehsil- Bhadra, District- Hanumangarh, Rajasthan-335511

(Application No. - 202114478639)

2.

Pawan Vaishnav S/o Prakash Chand Vaishnav, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Main Bazar Garniya, Tehsil- Jaitaran, District- Pali, Rajasthan-306302 (Application No. - 202114926337)

3.

Meenu Kumari Meena D/o Ram Pal Meena, Aged About 34

Years, R/o Village- Garh, Post - Garh, Tehsil- Bassi, District- Jaipur, Rajasthan-303302 (Application No. - 202114327412)

4.

Sunil Singh Tanwar S/o Kishor Singh Tanwar, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Village Post- Dabla, Tehsil- Neemkathana, District- Sikar, Rajasthan- 332718 (Application No. - 202114670921)

5.

Gopal Meena S/o Ramjilal Meena, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Village Post- Jhankari, Post- Nangalbani, Tehsil- Thanagazi, District-Alwar, Rajasthan- 301022 (Application No. - 202114791501)

6.

Seema Sharma D/o Murari Lal Sharma, Aged About 36

Years, R/o Vpo- Dangarwara, Tehsil- Jamwaramgarh, District- Jaipur, Rajasthan-303001 (Application No. - 202114849659)

7.

Avinash S/o Munshi Ram, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Ward No. 19, Suda Colony, Rawatsar, Tehsil- Rawatsar, District- Hanumangarh, Rajasthan-335524 (Application No. - 202114358444)

8.

Girvar Mahiya S/o Mohan Lal, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Village- Banwarla, Via- Ren, Tehsil- Degana, District- Nagaur, Rajasthan-341514

(Application

No.

-

202115088241-1)

9.

Pramod Kumar Mali S/o Raju Lal Mali, Aged About 28

Years, R/o Village And Post Office- Khedli, Tehsil- Bamanwas, District- Sawai Madhopur, Rajasthan-322214

(Application No. - 202114330391)

(2 of 3)

[CW-10825/2026]

10.

Sarita Khileri D/o Doongar Ram Khileri, Aged About 31

Years, R/o Village- Gunpaliya, Po- Chhappara, Tehsil- Ladnun, District- Nagaur, Rajasthan- 341303 (Application No. - 202114462064)

11.

Subhash Yadav S/o Ram Chandra Yadav, Aged About 30

Years, R/o Vpo- Panchota, Tehsil- Nawa, District- Nagaur, Rajasthan- 341509 (Application No. - 202114945854)

12.

Mahipal Bishnoi S/o Mohal Lal Bishnoi, Aged About 28

Years, R/o Village Post- Sankad, Tehsil- Sanchore, District- Jalore, Rajasthan-343040 (Application No.

202114900239)

----Petitioners

Versus

1.

State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Department Of Home, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Govt.

Secretariat, Jaipur.

2.

The Director General Of Police, Police Headquarters, Lalkothi, Jaipur, Rajasthan

3.

Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Through Its Secretary, Ghooghara Ghati, Jaipur Road, Ajmer 305001

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Bhawani Saini

Mr. Rajayan Singh

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. M.F Baig

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Order

15/07/2026

1. Mr. M.F. Baig, Advocate puts in appearance on behalf of the respondent No.3-RPSC.

2. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the Court deems it just and proper to allow the petitioners to make a representation to the Rajasthan Public

(3 of 3) [CW-10825/2026] Service Commission, as regards their grievances as made in the present Writ Petition.

3. In case, any such representation is received by the respondents from the petitioners within a period of five days from today, same shall be disposed of in accordance with law.

4. The Rajasthan Public Service Commission is directed to pass an appropriate order on the representation of the petitioners within a reasonable time, keeping in view the urgency and the issues involved in the present case.

5. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed of as above.

6. Stay application as well as pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Ravindra /25

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead