Rajasthan High Court

CW/11684/2026 of MUKESH KUMAR, HEAD CONSTABLE NO. 41 SON OF SHRI HARI RAM Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 14 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11684/2026 URN: CW / 25828U / 2026 Mukesh Kumar, Head Constable No. 41 Son Of Shri Hari Ram, Aged About 52 Years, Resident Of Vpo-Gadhla Kalan, Police- Station-Gudha, Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of

[2026:RJ-JP:26597]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11684/2026

URN: CW / 25828U / 2026

Mukesh Kumar, Head Constable No. 41 Son Of Shri Hari Ram, Aged About 52 Years, Resident Of Vpo-Gadhla Kalan, Police- Station-Gudha, Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan.

----Petitioner

Versus

1.

State Of Rajasthan, Through Additional Chief Secretary (Home), Home Department, Secretariat, Ashok Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan, Pin Code-302005

2.

Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Police Head Quarter (Phq), Lalkothi, Jaipur-302015

3.

Superintendent Of Police (G.r.p), District-Ajmer, Rajasthan.

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. MS Raghav

For Respondent(s)

:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Order

14/07/2026

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing the matter at some length made a limited prayer that he may be permitted to make a representation as regards the grievances raised in the present writ petition in light of the judgment passed by this Court in case of Raghuveer Singh Vs State of Rajasthan & Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.20358/2018), decided on 07.05.2024.

2. In view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is disposed of with liberty to

[2026:RJ-JP:26597] (2 of 2) [CW-11684/2026] the petitioner to submit a comprehensive representation to the Competent Authority with all his credentials and the judgments which he wants to rely.

3. In case, any such representation is received by the respondents from the petitioner within a period of thirty days from today, same shall be disposed of in accordance with law.

4. The stay application and pending application, if any, also stand disposed of. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Ravindra /13

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead