Rajasthan High Court

SAW/806/2025 of STATE OF RAJASTHAN Vs PRABODA NAND MEGHWAL SON OF SHRI JAMANA LAL on 13 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 806/2025 URN: SAW / 1709U / 2025 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department Of Home, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. Director General Of Police, Police Head Quarter, Lal Kothi, Jaipur (Raj.) 3.

[2026:RJ-JP:26301-DB]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 806/2025

URN: SAW / 1709U / 2025

1.

State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department Of Home, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)

2.

Director General Of Police, Police Head Quarter, Lal Kothi, Jaipur (Raj.)

3.

Superintendent Of Police, Kota, District Kota Rural (Raj.).

4.

District Collector Bundi (Land Revenue), District Bundi (Raj.)

----Appellants

Versus

Praboda Nand Meghwal Son Of Shri Jamana Lal, Aged About 26

Years, Resident Of Rayta, Post Ramganjbalaji, Thana Sadar, District Bundi (Raj.)

----Respondent

For Appellant(s)

:

Mr. Samee Khan for

Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG

For Respondent(s)

:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Order

13/07/2026

1. Defect(s) pointed out by the office, if any, is waived.

2. Heard on application (CMCW No.737/2025) filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condoning the delay in filing the appeal.

3. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed. Delay in filing the appeal is condoned.

4. Learned counsel for the appellants submit that the controversy involved in the present appeal is squarely covered by

[2026:RJ-JP:26301-DB] (2 of 2) [SAW-806/2025] the judgment passed by the Coordinate Bench of this Court in D.B. Special Appeal (Writ) No.61/2024 (State of Rajasthan Vs. Vinod Kumar Meena & Anr.) and other connected matters decided on 05.04.2024. Operative part of the judgment is quoted hereunder:- “4. In the present case, the respondents, vide impugned order passed by the learned Single Judge, have been granted only salary part and there is no order protecting them from recovery against expenses incurred on training. That being the legal and factual position, the issue raised in this batch of appeals is squarely covered by order dated 13.12.2016 passed in the case of Jagdish (supra).

5. Accordingly, the State appeals are liable to be dismissed and are accordingly dismissed.”

5. In view of the judgment passed by the Coordinate Bench of this Court in the matter of Vinod Kumar Meena (supra), the present appeal stands dismissed. All the pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (SANDEEP TANEJA),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J 136/AVINASH GULERIA

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead