Rajasthan High Court
CW/11857/2026 of SAPANA YADAV DAUGHTER OF BADAN SINGH YADAV WIFE OF PUSHPENDRA KUMAR YADAV Vs THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 13 July 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11857/2026 URN: CW / 26223U / 2026 1. Sapana Yadav Daughter Of Badan Singh Yadav Wife Of Pushpendra Kumar Yadav, Aged About 32 Years, Resident Of 113, Subhash Nagar, Behind N.e.b. Alwar-301001 (Raj.). Presently Posted As
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11857/2026
URN: CW / 26223U / 2026
1.
Sapana Yadav Daughter Of Badan Singh Yadav Wife Of Pushpendra Kumar Yadav, Aged About 32 Years, Resident Of 113, Subhash Nagar, Behind N.e.b. Alwar-301001
(Raj.). Presently Posted As Teacher Grade Iii Level I At Government Upper Primary School, Jayshra, Nagar, Deeg (Raj.).
2.
Premvati Daughter Of Kishan Lal Wife Of Nirmal Kumar, Aged About 37 Years, Resident Of Indra Colony, Harsana, Laxmangarh, District Alwar-321607 (Raj.). Presently Posted As Teacher Grade Iii Level I Government Primary School, Saperabas, Laxmangah, Alwar (Raj.).
3.
Prakash Bheel Son Of Ummeda Ram, Aged About 26
Years, Resident Of Geengala, P.o. Gingala, District Jodhpur-342312 (Raj.). Presently Posted As Teacher Grade Iii Level I At Government Senior Secondary School Hanumansagar, Ompura, Bapini, Phalodi (Raj.).
4.
Munna Ram Son Of Champa Ram, Aged About 26 Years, Resident Of Kinjari, Jodhpur-342312 (Raj.). Presently Posted As Teacher Grade Iii Level I, Mahatma Gandhi Government School, Dabla Nada, Ompura, Block Bapini, District Phalodi (Raj.).
----Petitioners
Versus
1.
The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of School Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan).
2.
The Director, Primary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner (Rajasthan).
3.
The District Education Officer (Headquarters), Primary/elementary, Deeg, District Deeg, (Rajasthan).
4.
The District Education Officer (Headquarters), Primary, Alwar, District Alwar, (Rajasthan).
5.
The District Education Officer (Headquarters), Primary, Phalodi, District Phalodi, (Rajasthan).
6.
Principal Government Upper Primary School, Jayshra,
(2 of 3)
[CW-11857/2026]
Nagar Deeg (Raj.).
7.
Principal Government Primary School, Saperabas, Laxmangah, Alwar (Raj.).
8.
Principal, Government Senior Secondary School, Hanumansagar, Ompura, Bapini, Phalodi (Raj.).
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Iliyas Khan
For Respondent(s)
:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
15/07/2026
1. By filing the present writ petition, the petitioners have challenged the action of the respondents in initiating recovery from their salaries/withholding their salaries for the period during which they pursued their B.Ed. internship.
2. After having heard the case for some length, the Court feels that ends of justice would meet if the petitioners are permitted to make comprehensive representation against their grievances to the Competent Authority.
3. Accordingly, the both the writ petitions are disposed of with a liberty to the petitioners to make comprehensive representation to the Competent Authority as raised in the present writ petition within a period of 15 days.
4. In case, any such representation is preferred by the petitioners to the Competent Authority within a period of 15 days, the Competent Authority shall consider it and pass an appropriate reasoned and speaking order dealing with the grievances of the petitioners in light of the orders referred in the prayer clause.
(3 of 3) [CW-11857/2026]
5. The respondent authority shall not make any recovery for the payment made to the petitioners for the period they were undergoing B.ed. internship till disposal of the representation.
6. The petitioners would be free to avail the appropriate remedy available to them under law if they are aggrieved by any decision on their representation. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J 35/Ravindra