Rajasthan High Court
CMA/2173/2026 of RAVI S/O SHRI MAHAVEER PRASAD Vs IQBAL S/O SHRI KASAM KHAN on 10 July 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 2173/2026 URN: CMA / 3687U / 2026 Ravi S/o Shri Mahaveer Prasad, R/o D-114, Indira Nagar, Jhunjhunu, Tehsil And District Jhunjhunu. ----Appellant Versus 1. Iqbal S/o Shri Kasam Khan, R/o Near Gudha Phatak, Ward No. 23,
[2026:RJ-JP:26033]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 2173/2026
URN: CMA / 3687U / 2026
Ravi S/o Shri Mahaveer Prasad, R/o D-114, Indira Nagar,
Jhunjhunu, Tehsil And District Jhunjhunu.
----Appellant
Versus
1.
Iqbal S/o Shri Kasam Khan, R/o Near Gudha Phatak, Ward No. 23, Moyal Colony, Jhunjhunu, Tehsil And District Jhunjhunu- First Address. R/o New Shyam Nagar Tankiwali Colony, Gudha Road, Jhunjhunu, Tehsil And District Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan) Second Address.
2.
Farook Ali S/o Shri Iqbal, R/o Near Gudha Phatak, Ward No. 23, Moyal Colony, Jhunjhunu, Tehsil And District Jhunjhunu- First Address. R/o New Shyam Nagar Tankiwali Colony, Gudha Road, Jhunjhunu, Tehsil And District Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan) Second Address.
3.
Manwar Ali S/o Ajim Khan, R/o Mohalla Batwalan,
4.
Khadim S/o Shri Salauddin, R/o Near Gudha Phatak,
Jhunjhunu, Tehsil And District Jhunjhunu.
5.
Akhtar Ali S/o Shri Jumma Khan, R/o Near Star Academy, Bakra Road, Jhunjhunu, Tehsil And District Jhunjhunu.
----Respondents
For Appellant(s)
:
Mr. Abhishek Bhardwaj
Mr. Pawan Kumar Verma
Mr. Kuldeep Sharma
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. MS Saharan
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
10/07/2026
1. Heard counsel for appellant-plaintiff and counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.2.
2. Appellant-plaintiff has preferred this miscellaneous appeal under Order 43 Rule 1 (r) CPC against the order dated 18.03.2026
[2026:RJ-JP:26033] (2 of 2) [CMA-2173/2026] passed by Additional District Judge No.2 Jhunjhunu on his application under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC in following terms: "vr% ewy okn ds xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ er O;Dr fd;s fcuk izkFkhZx.k dh vksj ls izLrqr izkFkZuk i= ckcr vLFkk;h fu"ks/kkKk fo:) vizkFkhZx.k Lohdkj fd;k tkdj vizkFkhZx.k dks bl vk'k; dh fu"ks/kkKk ls ikcan fd;k tkrk gS fd vizkFkhZx.k izkFkZuk i= esa of.kZr Hkwfe esa ls QeZ xksYMu flVh dks fnukad 27-09-2025 dks foØ; dh xbZ Hkwfe [kljk uacj 3667] 3668] dqy fdrk 2 dqy jdck 0-9400 gSDVs;j] [kljk uacj 5234@3654 dh 1-23 gSDVs;j Hkwfe dks NksM+dj 'ks"k Hkwfe ds laca/k esa ekSds o fjdkMZ dh fLFkfr dks ewy okn ds vafre fuLrkkj.k rd ;Fkkor cuk, j[ksaA"
3. Counsel for appellant-plaintiff does not dispute that as far as respondents-defendants No.1 & 2 are concerned, they have been injuncted by the trial Court and in respect of the property, sold to Firm-Golden City through registered sale deed dated 27.09.2025, prior to filing of the present civil suit dated 08.10.2025, an application for carrying out amendment in the plaint and separate application for injunction shall be filed, seeking relief against the Firm-Golden City.
4. In that view of the matter, without interference to the impugned order, permission to withdraw the present appeal is granted.
5. Accordingly, instant appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to appellant to take appropriate remedy against the Firm- Golden City, the subsequent buyer of the part of suit property, as permissible in law.
6. All pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J 25/RONAK JAIMAN