Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/8518/2026 of SANDEEP KUMAR S/O SUBESINGH Vs THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 9 July 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Second Bail Application No. 8518/2026 URN: CRLMB / 15488U / 2026 Sandeep Kumar S/o Subesingh, R/o Kohrana, Police Station Behror Sadar, District Kotputli-Behror. (At Present Confined In Sub District Jail, Behror).
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Second Bail Application No.
8518/2026
URN: CRLMB / 15488U / 2026
Sandeep Kumar S/o Subesingh, R/o Kohrana, Police Station Behror Sadar, District Kotputli-Behror. (At Present Confined In Sub District Jail, Behror).
----Accused-Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Vinay Pal Yadav
For Respondent(s)
:
Ms. Aarti Sharma
Mr. Ashvin Garg for the complainant
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
09/07/2026
1. This criminal misc. second bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 483 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 201/2025 registered at Police Station Behror Sadar, District Kotputli-Behror for the offences punishable under Sections 108, 308(2) and 189(2) BNS.
2. The first bail application bearing S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 15616/2025 was dismissed as withdrawn by this Court vide order dated 13.04.2026 with liberty to the petitioner file fresh bail application before the learned trial Court after examination of the husband of the deceased.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no photo/video has been recovered from the possession of the
(2 of 3) [CRLMB-8518/2026] petitioner and no certificate under Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 has been put on record for the only photo produced by the complainant before the learned trial Court. He further submits that the accused was arrested on 28.09.2025 and presently also, he is in judicial custody.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that there is neither any evidence that the accused had any intention or mens rea for the alleged offence nor there is any evidence on record to show that the deceased was left with no other option than to end her life. He also submits that the trial of the case is likely to take considerable time to conclude, therefore, the accused-petitioner may be enlarged on bail.
5. Per contra, the learned Public Prosecutor assisted by the learned counsel for the complainant has vehemently opposed this second bail application and submits that there are serious allegations against the petitioner.
6. Considered the submissions made at the Bar and also perused the material made available on record.
7. On perusal of the statement of the witnesses recorded so far and having regard to the orders passed by the learned Court below, it is revealed that serious allegations of causing harassment and distress to the wife of the complainant have been raised against the accused-petitioner. As per the statement of the complainant-husband recorded before the learned trial Court, he has alleged that his wife had been assaulted, harassed by calling her a characterless woman, threatened with respect to her photo, defamed in front of the entire village and was also subjected to extortion for an amount of Rs. 2,00,000/- by the accused-
(3 of 3) [CRLMB-8518/2026] petitioner to such an extent that she got compelled to consume poison and commit suicide.
8. Considering the over all facts and circumstances of the case, gravity of the offences and the material available on record, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.
9. Accordingly, the criminal misc. second bail application filed on behalf of the accused-petitioner, is dismissed. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J 11/ARTI SHARMA