Rajasthan High Court
CW/11528/2026 of SUNIL DIPAWAT S/O RAM KARAN Vs THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 9 July 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11528/2026 URN: CW / 25517U / 2026 Sunil Dipawat S/o Ram Karan, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Vpo Padu Khurd, Tehsil Riyan Badi, District Nagaur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal
[2026:RJ-JP:25902]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11528/2026
URN: CW / 25517U / 2026
Sunil Dipawat S/o Ram Karan, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Vpo Padu Khurd, Tehsil Riyan Badi, District Nagaur, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, School Education, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
2.
The Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner.
3.
Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Ajmer Through Its Secretary.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Ram pratap Saini
For Respondent(s)
:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
09/07/2026
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing at some length made a limited prayer that he may be permitted to make a representation to the respondent-authorities as regards the redressal of his grievance raised in the present writ petition.
2. In view of the limited prayer made by the counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to make representation to the respondent-authorities within a period of 15 days from today.
3. In case, any such representation is placed by the petitioner before the respondent-authorities, the same may be considered in the light of the circular dated 27.01.2025 and be
[2026:RJ-JP:25902] (2 of 2) [CW-11528/2026] decided by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt of the representation.
4. If the case of the petitioner is genuine in the light of the circular dated 27.01.2025 (if, it is applicable in the case of the petitioner) then required relief may be extended to the petitioner.
5. It is also made clear that in case the petitioner is aggrieved by any order taken by the respondent-authorities, he would be at liberty to avail appropriate remedy available to him under law. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J 45/SHRUTI SHARMA