Rajasthan High Court

CMA/2951/2026 of IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD., Vs BASANTA S/O HAJARI GURJAR on 8 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 2951/2026 URN: CMA / 5269U / 2026 Iffco Tokio General Insurance Company Ltd., Through Authorized Officer, Opposite To Main Airport Office, Jhalawar Road, Kota, (Rajasthan), Through Its Constituent Attorney. (Insurance

[2026:RJ-JP:25472]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 2951/2026

URN: CMA / 5269U / 2026

Iffco Tokio General Insurance Company Ltd., Through Authorized Officer, Opposite To Main Airport Office, Jhalawar Road, Kota, (Rajasthan), Through Its Constituent Attorney.

(Insurance Company Vehicle Tractor No. Rj-25-Rb-2965)

----Non Claimant No.3/Appellant

Versus

1.

Basanta S/o Hajari Gurjar, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Village Kunkata Khurd, Post Amargarh Chowki, Tehsil Gangapurcity, District Sawai Madhopur.

---Claimant/Respondent

2.

Chiranji Lal Gurjar S/o Ramkishore, R/o Village Kunkata Khurd, Post Amargarh Chowki, Tehsil Gangapurcity, District Sawai Madhopur.

(Vehicle Driver Tractor No. Rj 25 Rb 2965)

3.

Rajesh Kumar S/o Girraj, R/o Kunkata Kalan, Post Amargarh Chowki, Tehsil Gangapurcity, District Sawai Madhopur.

(Registered Vehicle Owner Tractor No. Rj 25 Rb 2965)

----Respondents

For Appellant(s)

:

Mr. Chanderdeep Singh Jodha

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Order

08/07/2026

1. The present appeal has been filed against the judgment and award dated 27.03.2026 passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Gangapur City in Claim Petition No.124/2016 titled as Basanta Vs. Chiranji Lal Gurjar & Ors. whereby, the claim petition filed by respondent No.1 has been partly allowed and an award of Rs.27,800/- was awarded in favour of claimant-respondent No.1.

[2026:RJ-JP:25472] (2 of 2) [CMA-2951/2026]

2. Section 173(2) of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 provides that no appeal shall lie against any award of a Claim Tribunal, if the amount in dispute in the appeal, is less than rupees one lakh.

3. In view of the said provision, the present, appeal, which has been filed against the impugned award whereby the compensation of Rs.27,800/- has been awarded, being not maintainable, is dismissed.

4. It is made clear that this order shall not affect other appeal(s), if any, filed by the appellant against the aforesaid impugned judgment and award.

5. All pending applications, if any, shall also stand dismissed. (ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J 4/TANISHA

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead