Rajasthan High Court

WRES/188/2026 of STATE OF RAJASTHAN Vs PRAKASH NARAIN NATANI SON OF LATE SHRI LAXMINARAIN NATANI on 7 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Writ Restoration Application No. 188/2026 URN: WRES / 291U / 2026 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Director, Pension Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur. ----Petitioners Versus Prakash

[2026:RJ-JP:25574]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Writ Restoration Application No. 188/2026

URN: WRES / 291U / 2026

1.

State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

2.

Director, Pension Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

----Petitioners

Versus

Prakash Narain Natani Son Of Late Shri Laxminarain Natani, Aged About 84 Years, R/o 69/91 Veer Tejaji Road, Mansarover, Jaipur.

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Kuldeep Singh Rathore for Ms.

Mahi Yadav, AAG

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Order

07/07/2026 An application No.329/2026 has been filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay of 186 days in filing the restoration application. Considered the submissions made by counsel for the applicant/petitioner and the reasons mentioned in the application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, the same is allowed. The delay in filing the restoration application is condoned. This restoration application has been filed by the petitioner- State for restoration of the S.B. Review Petition No.36/2020 which was dismissed vide order dated 09.07.2025 pursuant to the peremptory order dated 02.05.2025 which is in regard to filing of

[2026:RJ-JP:25574] (2 of 2) [WRES-188/2026] an appropriate application for taking the legal heirs of the deceased-respondent on record. Having regard to the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner and the averments made in the application, the Court deems just and proper to restore the review petition subject to cost of Rs.2,000/- to be paid with the Rajasthan High Court Bar Association, Jaipur. Accordingly, the restoration application is allowed. On submitting of receipt of depositing the cost amount, the review petition bearing S.B. Review Petition No.36/2020 is restored to its original number. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J 79/Ashish Kumar

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead