Rajasthan High Court
CW/3511/2026 of SUMRIDHI ALUMINIUM PRIVATE LIMITED Vs HIND TRADERS on 6 July 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3511/2026 URN: CW / 7731U / 2026 1. Sumridhi Aluminium Private Limited, Through Its Authorised Representative, Mr. Deepak Kumar Shukla S/o Vinod Shukla Aged About 38 Years Having Its Registered Office Address At E-23- A , East
[2026:RJ-JP:25141]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3511/2026
URN: CW / 7731U / 2026
1.
Sumridhi Aluminium Private Limited, Through Its Authorised Representative, Mr. Deepak Kumar Shukla S/o Vinod Shukla Aged About 38 Years Having Its Registered Office Address At E-23-A, East Of Kailash Delhi-110065, Plant Office Khasra No.
380-455, Dawali Mundkol Road Village-Bhagola Palwar- 121102, Haryana.
2.
Anil Kanodia, Director Of Sumridhi Aluminium Private Limited Having Its Registered Office Address At E-23-A, East Of Kailash Delhi-110065, Plant Office Khasra No. 380-455, Dawali Mundkol Road Village-Bhagola Palwar-121102, Haryana.
3.
Rekha Kanodia, Director Of Sumridhi Aluminium Private Limited Having Its Registered Office Address At E-23-A, East Of Kailash Delhi-110065, Plant Office Khasra No. 380-455, Dawali Mundkol Road Village-Bhagola Palwar-121102, Haryana.
4.
Abhimanyu Kanodia, Director Of Sumridhi Aluminium Private Limited Having Its Registered Office Address At E-23-A, East Of Kailash Delhi-110065, Plant Office Khasra No. 380-455, Dawali Mundkol Road Village-Bhagola Palwar-121102, Haryana.
----Petitioners
Versus
Hind Traders, Through Its Partner Ashwani Gupta S/o Late Ramavtar Gupta Aged About 55 Years R/o 38 Manu Marg, Alwar, Rajasthan
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Sharad Dadhich for
Ms. Purvi Mathur
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Gaurav Gupta
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
06/07/2026
1. This writ petition has been filed by and on behalf of the defendants, feeling aggrieved by dismissal of their application under Order VII Rule 10 CPC, through which objection was raised before the Commercial Court that the commercial suit is triable before the Court at Gujarat/ Haryana and not before Alwar.
[2026:RJ-JP:25141] (2 of 2) [CW-3511/2026]
2. Counsel for the respondent-plaintiff, at the outset, pointed out that after passing the impugned order, the commercial suit itself has been decreed vide judgment dated 28.04.2026. A copy of the judgment and decree dated 28.04.2026 has been placed on record.
3. Counsel for petitioners, in such view of the matter, seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to raise the objection of territorial jurisdiction in the appeal, if filed against the judgment and decree dated 28.04.2026.
4. In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on the merits/ demerits of the impugned order, instant writ petition is allowed to be withdrawn and the same stands disposed of accordingly with the liberty as prayed for.
5. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J Sachin Sharma/ 63