Rajasthan High Court
CW/19579/2024 of SMT. LAXMI RATHORE W/O PARMESHWAR SINGH PARMAR, S/O HARNATH SINGH Vs SMT. PRIYA SINGH W/O SAMEER SINGH PARMAR on 6 July 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19579/2024 URN: CW / 41342U / 2024 Smt. Laxmi Rathore W/o Parmeshwar Singh Parmar, S/o Harnath Singh, Aged About 56 Years, R/o 3-F-23 Mahaveer Nagar, Vistar Yojana, Thana Mahaveer Nagar Kota (Raj.) Through Power Of Attorney
[2026:RJ-JP:25021]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19579/2024
URN: CW / 41342U / 2024
Smt. Laxmi Rathore W/o Parmeshwar Singh Parmar, S/o Harnath Singh, Aged About 56 Years, R/o 3-F-23 Mahaveer Nagar, Vistar Yojana, Thana Mahaveer Nagar Kota (Raj.) Through Power Of Attorney Holder Jitendra Singh, S/o Jodha Singh, Aged About 48
Years, R/o 103, Gali No. 3 Krishna Nagar Thana Borkheda District Kota (Raj)
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
Smt. Priya Singh W/o Sameer Singh Parmar, Aged About 46 Years, Resident Of 132/5, Civil Lines Station Road, Thana Nayapura, Kota (Raj.)
2.
Sameer Singh Parmar, S/o Chandrakant Singh Parmar, Aged About 48 Years, Resident Of 132/5, Civil Lines Station Road, Thana Nayapura, Kota (Raj.)
3.
Chandrakant Singh Parmar, S/o Late Jodha Singh Parmar, Aged About 75 Years, Resident Of 132/5, Civil Lines Station Road, Thana Nayapura, Kota (Raj.)
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Rahul Singh Chauhan for
Mr. R. K. Daga
For Respondent(s)
:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
06/07/2026
1. By way of filling instant writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, petitioner-plaintiff challenged an interlocutory order dated 13.11.2024 passed by the Additional Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate No.2 (North), Kota, dismissing an application filed by plaintiff, to record her evidence on commission.
2. Counsel for petitioner states that the original suit before the trial Court has been decided, therefore, in that view, the challenge
[2026:RJ-JP:25021] (2 of 2) [CW-19579/2024] to the interlocutory order dated 13.11.2024 made in the present petition, has rendered infructuous. The factum of the civil suit having been decided, has also been affirmed by the status report dated 04.07.2026 received from the trial Court.
3. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of as having become infructuous.
4. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, also also stand disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J Sachin Sharma/ S-113