Rajasthan High Court
CW/11168/2026 of KULDEEP MEENA S/O BABLU MEENA Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 4 July 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11168/2026 URN: CW / 24799U / 2026 1. Kuldeep Meena S/o Bablu Meena, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Dhandhuret, Bhadurpur, District Karauli, Rajasthan- 322249. 2. Mukesh Kumar Solanki S/o Jagdish Solanki, Aged About 20 Years, R/o
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11168/2026
URN: CW / 24799U / 2026
1.
Kuldeep Meena S/o Bablu Meena, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Dhandhuret, Bhadurpur, District Karauli, Rajasthan-
322249.
2.
Mukesh Kumar Solanki S/o Jagdish Solanki, Aged About 20 Years, R/o 167, Aradhana Apartments, Civil Lines, District Jaipur, Rajasthan- 302006.
3.
Gajendra Singh S/o Budha Singh, Aged About 18 Years, R/o 80, Feet Road, Mehash Nagar, District Jaipur, Rajasthan.
4.
Jaswant Singh S/o Jethu Singh, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Plot No. 67, Ward No.9, Lalsot, District Dausa, Rajasthan.
5.
Ravi Kumar Pareta S/o Dinesh Pareta, Aged About 20
Years, R/o Kumawat Mohalla, Tehsil Saneod Kanwas, District Kota, Rajasthan- 325602.
6.
Ravindra Singh S/o Bhagirath Singh, Aged About 19
Years, R/o Bus Stand Road, Near Coaching Center, Tehsil Sikar, District Sikar, Rajasthan.
7.
Krishan Pal Singh S/o Lal Singh, Aged About 20 Years, R/o 156, Near Museum Road, District Ajmer, Rajasthan.
8.
Rajpal Gurjar S/o Prakash Gurjar, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Bara Naya Gaon, Po Baranaya Gaon, District Bundi, Rajasthan- 323024.
9.
Narendra Gurjar S/o Bharat Lal Gurjar, Aged About 23
Years, R/o Gurjarbada, Shekhapura, Sikrai, District Dausa, Rajasthan- 303501.
10.
Divya D/o Ramlal, Aged About 21 Years, R/o 156, Gaytri Nagar, Sodala, District Jaipur, Rajathan- 302006.
11.
Rameshwar Chand Meghwal S/o Kailash Chand Meghwal, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Meghwal Mohalla, Sirpoi Khurd, District Jhalawar, Rajasthan- 326513.
12.
Krishan Ram S/o Jaisa Ram, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Ram Nagar Extension, Plot No. 198, Ram Nagar, Sodala, District Jaipur, Rajasthan.
13.
Pooja D/o Satbir, Aged About 21 Years, R/o 156, Ganesh Nagar, Tehsil Sikar, District Sikar, Rajasthan.
(2 of 3)
[CW-11168/2026]
14.
Ramswaroop S/o Aasuram, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Subedar Tank, Near Badi Bass, District Tonk, Rajasthan.
----Petitioners
Versus
1.
State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department Of Secondary Education, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, District Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2.
Director, Directorate Of Secondary Education, District Bikaner, Rajasthan.
3.
Secretary, Rajasthan Public Service Commission, District Ajmer, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
Petitioner No.1
:
Mr. Kuldeep Meena, present in person
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Ram Niwas Mehta, Secretary
RPSC
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
04/07/2026
1. The petitioner No.1- Mr. Kuldeep Meena, present in person before this Court submits that initially vide advertisement dated 17.07.2025 the respondent- RPSC, Ajmer advertised as many as 1385 vacancies for Senior Teacher (Grade-II) for Maths. Later on, vide advertisement/corrigendum dated 25.06.2026 the respondent RPSC has enhanced the vacancies for Senior Teacher Maths from 1385 to 2181.
2. The petitioner No.1 further submits that as per the provisions of Rajasthan Educational (State and Subordinate) Service Rules, 2021 (for short ‘the Rules of 2021’), the respondents cannot enhance the vacancies more than 50%. He also submits that the enhancement of the vacancies is beyond the
(3 of 3) [CW-11168/2026] limit prescribed under the Rules of 2021 and it is an action of the respondents taking away the rights of those future candidates who would be eligible for recruitment and against the vacancies which have been included by the respondents in the present advertisement in which he is not eligible for want of requisite educational qualification.
3. The petitioner No.1 further submits that some of the petitioners are eligible with the other subjects for which the vacancies have been advertised and later on, the respondent RPSC enhanced the vacancies beyond the permissible limit of 50%.
4. Mr. Ram Niwas Mehta, Secretary RPSC present in person states before this Court that in whichever subject the vacancies have been enhanced more than 50% by the corrigendum, the RPSC will withdraw the vacancies which have been enhanced beyond the limit of 50%.
5. In view of the statement made by the Secretary RPSC, the grievance raised in its writ petition stands redressed and thus the present writ petition is disposed of.
6. The RPSC, Ajmer, shall issue necessary corrigendum for withdrawing the excess vacancies included beyond the permissible limit of 50%.
7. The stay application and pending application, if any, also stand disposed of. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J 17/SHRUTI SHARMA