Rajasthan High Court
WMAP/163/2026 of SURESH KUMAR SHARMA S/O SHRI RAMSAHAY SHARMA Vs THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 3 July 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Writ Miscellaneous Application No. 163/2026 URN: WMAP / 356U / 2026 Suresh Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Ramsahay Sharma, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Village Meenawada, Tehsil Sikrai, District Dausa. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its
[2026:RJ-JP:24872]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Writ Miscellaneous Application No. 163/2026
URN: WMAP / 356U / 2026
Suresh Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Ramsahay Sharma, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Village Meenawada, Tehsil Sikrai, District Dausa.
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Govt.
Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2.
Principal Secretary, Department Of School Education, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
3.
Director, Elementary Education Rajasthan, Bikaner
4.
Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Dausa
5.
District Education Officer, Elementary Education, Dausa
6.
Chief Block Elementary Education Officer, Block Lawan, District Dausa
7.
Paden Panchayat Elementary Education Officer, (P.e.e.o.)
Cum Principal Cum Chairman School Development Management Committee, Govt. Sr. Secondary School Shyalawas, District Dausa
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Sudhir Yadav
For Respondent(s)
:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
03/07/2026 This writ miscellaneous application has been filed by the petitioner seeking modification of the order dated 16.08.2023 passed by the Co-ordinate Bench. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the correct name of the petitioner's father is 'Ram Sahay Sharma', however,
[2026:RJ-JP:24872] (2 of 2) [WMAP-163/2026] due to an inadvertent typographical error, the name of the petitioner's father was incorrectly mentioned in the title of the writ petition as 'Ramsahai Sharma'. He further submits that after disposal of the writ petition when the petitioner approached the respondent-authorities seeking relief in the light of the directions given by the Court, the petitioner has been denied relief on account of incorrect name of the petitioner's father in the cause-title attached with the order. Having regard to the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner and the averments made in the application, the Court deems just and proper to allow the prayer for modification. Accordingly, the application for modification is allowed. Name of the petitioner's father in the order dated 16.08.2023 be read as 'Ram Sahay Sharma' in place of 'Ramsahai Sharma'. This order be treated as part and partial of the order dated 16.08.2023. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J 46/SHRUTI SHARMA