Rajasthan High Court
CW/16306/2025 of AFSANA BANO D/O SULEMAN GOURI Vs THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 3 July 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14600/2025 URN: CW / 33028U / 2025 Prachi Maderna D/o Lavkush, W/o Mahesh Chand ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16306/2025 URN: CW / 37133U / 2025 Afsana
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14600/2025
URN: CW / 33028U / 2025
Prachi Maderna D/o Lavkush, W/o Mahesh Chand
----Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Rajasthan
----Respondent
Connected With
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16306/2025
URN: CW / 37133U / 2025
Afsana Bano D/o Suleman Gouri
----Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Rajasthan
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Ram Partap Saini
For Respondent(s)
:
Ms. Manju Joshi with
Ms. Deepa Singh
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
03/07/2026 By filing of both these petitions, the petitioners have prayed for the respondents to comply with the order dated 03.05.2019 and 30.08.2022, as regards release of salary in favour of the petitioners for the period they were undergoing B.ed. internship. After having heard the case for some length, the Court feels that ends of justice would meet if the petitioners are permitted to make comprehensive representation against their grievances to the Competent Authority. Accordingly, the both the writ petitions are disposed of with a liberty to the petitioners to make comprehensive representation to
(2 of 2) [CW-14600/2025] the Competent Authority as raised in the present writ petition within a period of 15 days. In case, any such representation is preferred by the petitioners to the Competent Authority within a period of 15 days, the Competent Authority shall consider it and pass an appropriate reasoned and speaking order dealing with the grievances of the petitioners in light of the orders referred in the prayer clause. The respondent authority shall not make any recovery for the payment made to the petitioners for the period they were undergoing B.ed. internship till disposal of the representation. The petitioners would be free to avail the appropriate remedy available to them under law if they are aggrieved by any decision on their representation. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J 10-11/RACHNA