Rajasthan High Court

CW/9531/2026 of RAMULAL SAINI S/O SHRI RAMJILAL SAINI Vs PANKAJ JAIN S/O SHRI AADESH KUMAR JAIN on 2 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9531/2026 URN: CW / 21312U / 2026 Ramulal Saini S/o Shri Ramjilal Saini, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Mohalla Jal Wala Kuhan, Front Of School No. 3, Alwar Raj. Hall Kirayadar Dukandar, Dukan Wake 1, Hopecircus Alwar Tehsil And

[2026:RJ-JP:24530]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9531/2026

URN: CW / 21312U / 2026

Ramulal Saini S/o Shri Ramjilal Saini, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Mohalla Jal Wala Kuhan, Front Of School No. 3, Alwar Raj. Hall Kirayadar Dukandar, Dukan Wake 1, Hopecircus Alwar Tehsil And Distt. Alwar, Rajasthan.

----Petitioner

Versus

Pankaj Jain S/o Shri Aadesh Kumar Jain, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Plot No. 1 Hopecircus Alwar Rajasthan.

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Hanish Khan

For Respondent(s)

:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Order

02/07/2026

1. Counsel for the petitioner submits that, during the execution proceedings, possession of the rented premises has already been taken from the petitioner, therefore, challenge to the order dated 04.05.2026 has rendered infructuous. Hence, petitioner does not want to press this petition. However, counsel further submits that the petitioner deposited the entire rent in advance in terms of the compromise arrived at between the parties, and despite the same, respondents have arbitrarily obtained possession of the rented premises in execution prior to 13.08.2029. He, therefore, prays that petitioner may be granted liberty to avail appropriate legal remedy, if permissible in law.

[2026:RJ-JP:24530] (2 of 2) [CW-9531/2026]

2. In view of the above, the present writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty as prayed for.

3. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J Sachin/ 9

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead