Rajasthan High Court
CW/10403/2026 of PRANAYDEV S/O SHRI JITENDRA DUBEY Vs SUDHA MITTAL W/O SHRI ANIL MITTAL on 2 July 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10403/2026 URN: CW / 23073U / 2026 Pranaydev S/o Shri Jitendra Dubey, Aged About 45 Years, R/o House No. C-07, Ashok Vihar, Alwar, Rajasthan, At Present Tenant, Shopkeeper, Shop, Lower Ground Floor, Plot No. 4, Balaji Mansion,
[2026:RJ-JP:24549]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10403/2026
URN: CW / 23073U / 2026
Pranaydev S/o Shri Jitendra Dubey, Aged About 45 Years, R/o House No. C-07, Ashok Vihar, Alwar, Rajasthan, At Present Tenant, Shopkeeper, Shop, Lower Ground Floor, Plot No. 4, Balaji Mansion, Near Jail Chauraha, Alwar, Tehsil And District Alwar, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
Sudha Mittal W/o Shri Anil Mittal, Aged About 55 Years, R/o House No. 251, Scheme No. 01, Alwar Tehsil And District Alwar (Raj).
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Archit Bohra,
Mr. Prakhar Jain
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Mohit Gupta
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
02/07/2026
1. On behalf of respondent, counsel has put in appearance on caveat.
2. Heard counsel for both parties and perused the material available on record.
3. The issue involved in the present matter pertains to compliance or non-compliance of the terms and conditions of the compromise arrived at between the parties regarding payment of arrears of mesne profits as well as future mesne profits.
4. Indisputably, a decree for eviction and recovery of arrears of rent was passed against the petitioner, which was affirmed in appeal. Thereafter, when the matter came up before the High Court, parties entered into a compromise, pursuant to which petitioner was given time to vacate the rented premises till 31.01.2029, subject to
[2026:RJ-JP:24549] (2 of 2) [CW-10403/2026] payment of outstanding mesne profits and future mesne profits at the rate of Rs.45,000/- per month w.e.f. 01.02.2026. The order dated 09.01.2026 is a final order, which is binding upon parties.
5. It appears that respondents/ decree-holders raised an objection alleging non-payment of the entire amount of mesne profits and sought execution of the decree. On the said application, the Rent Tribunal, Alwar, being an Executing Court, passed the impugned order dated 30.05.2026, whereby a warrant for possession as well as a warrant for recovery of arrears amounting to Rs.8,43,341/- has been issued against the petitioner, whereagainst this writ petition has been filed.
6. A bare perusal of the impugned order reveals that the Executing Court has neither discussed the particulars of the amounts deposited by petitioner, nor assigned any reason as to how arrears of mesne profits amounting to Rs.8,43,341/- were found due against petitioner. The impugned order is cryptic, non-speaking and unreasoned. It is apparent that the Presiding Officer, Rent Tribunal, Alwar, has passed the impugned order without due application of mind.
7. Consequently, the impugned order dated 30.05.2026 is set aside. The Executing Court is directed to reconsider the matter afresh, and thereafter, shall pass a speaking and reasoned order, in accordance with law.
8. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed of.
9. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J Sachin Sharma/ 11