Rajasthan High Court
CW/11007/2026 of PANKAJ SINGH SON OF SHRI RAJENDRA SINGH Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 2 July 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11007/2026 URN: CW / 24448U / 2026 Pankaj Singh Son Of Shri Rajendra Singh, Aged About 31 Years, Resident Of Bawadi Chok, Village And Post Buhana, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through
[2026:RJ-JP:24486]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11007/2026
URN: CW / 24448U / 2026
Pankaj Singh Son Of Shri Rajendra Singh, Aged About 31 Years, Resident Of Bawadi Chok, Village And Post Buhana, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)
2.
Mission Director, National Health Mission, Medical Health And Family Welfare, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C- Scheme, Jaipur (Raj.)
3.
Project Director, National Health Mission, Medical Health And Family Welfare, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C- Scheme, Jaipur (Raj.)
4.
Secretary, Rajasthan Service Selection Board, Durgapura, Jaipur (Raj.)
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Bajrang Sepat for
Ms. Komal Kumari Giri
For Respondent(s)
:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
02/07/2026
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied if the respondents are directed to consider and decided the representation (Annexure-9) submitted by him on 18.05.2026.
2. Heard.
[2026:RJ-JP:24486] (2 of 2) [CW-11007/2026]
3. Considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petititoner.
4. Taking into consideration the nature of the petition and so also limited prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Court feels that the ends of justice would meet if the respondents are directed to consider the representation if submitted by the petitioner to the respondents.
5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with the directions to the respondent No. 2 that in case the petitioner has submitted the respresentation (Annexure-9) in actual to the respondent authority then same may be considered and disposed of within a period of one month from the date of receiving the certified copy of this order. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J 95/RACHNA