Rajasthan High Court
CW/26311/2018 of VIMLESH KUMARI, D/O SH. UMA SHANKAR SHARMA Vs RAJASTHAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, THROUGH ITS SECRETARY on 1 July 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 26311/2018 URN: CW / 44695U / 2018 1. Vimlesh Kumari, D/o Sh. Uma Shankar Sharma, Aged About 34 Years, Presently Residing At 80/10 Kumbha Marg, Pratap Nagar, Jaipur. 2. Nand Kishore Saini, S/o Of Shri Bharoo Lal Saini, Aged
[2026:RJ-JP:24222]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 26311/2018
URN: CW / 44695U / 2018
1.
Vimlesh Kumari, D/o Sh. Uma Shankar Sharma, Aged About 34 Years, Presently Residing At 80/10 Kumbha Marg, Pratap Nagar, Jaipur.
2.
Nand Kishore Saini, S/o Of Shri Bharoo Lal Saini, Aged About 36 Years, Obc Catgory, Resident Of Toda Gate, Village And Post Baghera, Tehsil Kekri, District Ajmer- 305415 (Raj.)
----Petitioners
Versus
1.
Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Through Its Secretary, Ajmer-305001 (Raj.)
2.
State Of Rajasthan Through Its Director, College Education, Dr Radha Krishnan Shikha Shankul, Jaipur
302017.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Dr. Saugath Roy
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Mirza Faisal Baig with
Mr. Govind Gupta
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
01/07/2026
1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners with regard to the recruitment to the Post of College Lecturer (EAFM) pursuant to the advertisement dated 12.01.2015 and Corrigendum dated 01.09.2016.
2. Vide interim order dated 03.12.2018, the respondent RPSC was directed to interview the petitioners for the post of Lecturer (EAFM) and it was further directed that the result
[2026:RJ-JP:24222] (2 of 2) [CW-26311/2018] of the petitioners may not be declared without permission of the Court but be kept in a seal cover and two of the vacant seats being filled up on the post of Lecturer (EAFM) be kept vacant.
3. In view of the interim order of the Court, the petitioners was allowed to participate in the selection process, including the interview.
4. Vide order dated 09.07.2025, the respondent RPSC was directed to produce the result of the petitioners in sealed cover before the Court.
5. Having gone through the result produced before this Court of both the petitioners, with regard to the recruitment to the Post of College Lecturer (EAFM), this Court finds that even after the petitioners are held to be eligible than also they do not find place in the merit list as they have not secured the marks up to the cut of marks.
6. In view of the above, this Court without going through the merit of the case, dismiss this writ petition.
7. Result of the petitioners in sealed cover is returned back to the learned counsel appearing for the RPSC. If any vacancy has been kept vacant, in view of the interim order passed by the Court, same may be filled up as per normal process.
8. The stay application and pending application, if any, also stand disposed of. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J 55/ARTI SHARMA