Rajasthan High Court
CW/10304/2026 of BRAHM SINGH S/O LATE SH. NABAV Vs MUKESH SINGH S/O LATE SH. NABAV on 30 June 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10304/2026 URN: CW / 22906U / 2026 Brahm Singh S/o Late Sh. Nabav, Aged About 61 Years, R/o Purabaikhera, Teh. Bayana, Dist. Bharatpur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. Mukesh Singh S/o Late Sh. Nabav, R/o Purabaikhera, Teh.
[2026:RJ-JP:23969]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10304/2026
URN: CW / 22906U / 2026
Brahm Singh S/o Late Sh. Nabav, Aged About 61 Years, R/o Purabaikhera, Teh. Bayana, Dist. Bharatpur (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
Mukesh Singh S/o Late Sh. Nabav, R/o Purabaikhera, Teh.
Bayana, Dist. Bharatpur (Raj.)
2.
Kushum D/o Late Sh. Nabav Singh, W/o Sh. Digamber Singh, R/o Nagla Bhuriya, Teh. And Dist. Agara (Up).
3.
Krishana D/o Late Sh. Nabav Singh W/o Sh. Ramveer Singh, R/o Nagla Bhuriya, Teh. And Dist. Agara (Up).
4.
Pushpa D/o Late Sh. Nabav Singh, W/o Sh. Inderpal Singh, R/o Kothi Guljar Bag, Bharatpur (Raj.).
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Brahma Prakash
For Respondent(s)
:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
30/06/2026
1. Petitioner is plaintiff, and seeking direction to decide his Civil Suit No. 154/2023, titled Brahm Singh v. Mukesh Singh, pending before the Court of Civil Judge, Bayana, District Bharatpur, expeditiously and within a stipulated time.
2. Having heard counsel for petitioner and from perusal of order-sheets of the trial Court, it appears that an application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC has been filed, and at that stage, counsel for both parties submitted before the Court on 23.02.2026, that parties want to explore the possibility of an
[2026:RJ-JP:23969] (2 of 2) [CW-10304/2026] amicable settlement through mediation. Hence, the matter was referred to mediation, however, later on the mediation proceedings have failed
3. This Court does not find any undue delay or inaction on the part of the trial Court to proceed further in the civil suit. In the given circumstances, no case is made out for issuance of any direction by this Court to expedite the trial of the present suit. However, it is open for the petitioner to argue on the pending application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC, and to diligently pursue his suit before the trial Court.
4. With the aforesaid observations, the present writ petition stands disposed of.
5. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
6. A copy of this order be sent to the trial Court. (SUDESH BANSAL),J Sachin Sharma/ 12