Rajasthan High Court
CW/10042/2026 of RAJBALA W/O SHRI RAJPAL Vs COMMISSIONER on 30 June 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10042/2026 URN: CW / 22380U / 2026 Rajbala W/o Shri Rajpal, Aged About 54 Years, R/o Ward No.8, Bhudawali Ke Pass, Khairthal, Tehsil Khairthal, District Khairthal Tijara, Raj. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Commissioner, Nagar
[2026:RJ-JP:23940]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10042/2026
URN: CW / 22380U / 2026
Rajbala W/o Shri Rajpal, Aged About 54 Years, R/o Ward No.8, Bhudawali Ke Pass, Khairthal, Tehsil Khairthal, District Khairthal Tijara, Raj.
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
Commissioner, Nagar Parishad, District Khairthal Tiajra.
2.
District Collector, Khairthal Tijara Raj.
3.
Jagram Gurjar S/o Natthu, Aged About 51 Years, R/o Jatiyana, Tehsil Kotkasim, District Khairthal Tijara, Raj.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Sunil Kumar Chechi for
Mr. Om Prakash Sharma
For Respondent(s)
:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
30/06/2026
1. By means of filing instant writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, petitioner is seeking a direction to expedite the proceedings of his Civil Suit No.30/2025, titled Rajbala v. Commissioner, Nagar Parishad, District Khairthal, pending before the Court of Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate, Kishangarh Bas, District Alwar, and to decide the same within a stipulated time.
2. Having heard counsel for petitioner and from perusal of order-sheets of the trial Court, this Court finds the present writ petition to be wholly misconceived, and there is no undue delay or inaction on the part of the trial Court in conducting the
[2026:RJ-JP:23940] (2 of 2) [CW-10042/2026] proceedings. No material has been placed on record to show that the suit is not being proceeded with in accordance with law.
3. This Court further finds that the practice of present petitioner to invoke the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court for seeking directions to expedite proceedings, without any cogent reason, deserves to be deprecated.
4. In view of the above, the writ petition is hereby dismissed.
5. Pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of.
6. A copy of this order be sent to the trial Court. (SUDESH BANSAL),J Sachin Sharma/ 15