Rajasthan High Court
CW/7989/2004 of SHUBHKARAN AND ORS Vs STATE OF RAJ AND ORS on 30 June 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7989/2004 URN: CW / 13039U / 2004 1. Shubhkaran S/o Shri Manna Ram, aged about 34 years, R/o Village and Post Harmada, District Ajmer at present posted in Police Lines, Jaipur. 2. Sanwar Mal S/o Shri Raghunath Prasad, aged
[2026:RJ-JP:24037]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7989/2004
URN: CW / 13039U / 2004
1. Shubhkaran S/o Shri Manna Ram, aged about 34 years, R/o Village and Post Harmada, District Ajmer at present posted in Police Lines, Jaipur.
2. Sanwar Mal S/o Shri Raghunath Prasad, aged about 30
years at present posted as Sub Inspector of Police in District Alwar.
3. Rakesh Kumar S/o Shri Babulal, R/o 2/460, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur at present posted as Sub Inspector, District Doongapur.
4. Dinesh S/o Shri Babu Lal Khatik, R/o 2/460 Malviya Nagar, Jaipur at present posted as Sub Inspector, District Hanumangarh.
----Petitioners
Versus
1. The State of Rajasthan through Additional Chief Secretary- Cum-Principal Secretary, Home and Justice, Govt. of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. Director General of Police Rajasthan, Jaipur.
3. The Member Secretary of the qualifying Board Constituted for Promotion from the Post of Sub Inspector to the Inspector of Police-Cum-Superintendent of Police, Head Quarter, Jaipur City, Jaipur.
4. Shri Mangilal S/o Shri Kalu Ram, aged about 28 Years, Police Station Kotwali, Jaipur City, Jaipur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
None present
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Somitra Chaturvedi, Dy.G.C. with
Mr. Manvendra Singh FAuzdar
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
30/06/2026
[2026:RJ-JP:24037] (2 of 2) [CW-7989/2004] No one has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioners even in the second round. It seems that the petitioners are not interested in pursuing the present writ petition. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution. The stay application and pending application, if any, also stand disposed of. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J 119/ARTI SHARMA