Rajasthan High Court

CRLMB/6312/2026 of SANDEEP URF DHOLARAM S/O AMICHAND Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 19 June 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6312/2026 Sandeep Urf Dholaram S/o Amichand, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Sundarpura, Police Station Kotputali, District Kotputali-Behror. (Rajasthan) (Presently Accused Petitioner Is Confined In District Jail

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6312/2026

Sandeep Urf Dholaram S/o Amichand, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Sundarpura, Police Station Kotputali, District Kotputali-Behror.

(Rajasthan) (Presently Accused Petitioner Is Confined In District Jail Kotputali-Behror).

----Petitioner

Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s)

:

None present

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA-cum-AAG

Mr. Naresh Kumar Gupta, Dy. GA-

cum-PP

Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA (V. J.)

Judgment / Order

19/06/2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS, 2023 against the order dated 15.04.2026 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Kotputli-Behror, in Bail Application No. 112/2026, whereby the bail application of the petitioner was rejected in connection with F.I.R. No. 583/2026 registered at Police Station-Kotputli, District-Kotputli Behror, for the offences under Section 111(2), 111(4), 115(2), 126(2), 140(3), 307, 308(2), 351(2), 61(2)(A) BNS, 2023 and Section 3/25 Arms Act.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the offences are triable by a Magistrate except Section 111 BNS and that the conclusion of the trial is likely to take a considerable amount of

(2 of 3) [CRLMB-6312/2026] time. He submits that the challan has already been filed. He further submits that there is only one criminal antecedent. He, therefore, prays that the petitioner be enlarged on bail, particularly in view of the fact that he has remained in judicial custody since 18.12.2025.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application.

5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.

6. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and having regard to the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties, and considering the fact that the offences are triable by Magistrate except Section 111 BNS and the challan has been filed and trial will take time, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application filed by the petitioner deserves to be accepted.

7. Consequently, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered that the petitioner namely-Sandeep Urf Dholaram S/o Amichand arrested in connection with F.I.R. No. 583/2026 registered at Police Station-Kotputli, District-Kotputli Behror, shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/ (Rupees One Lakh Only) with two sureties of Rs.50,000/ (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) each, subject to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before the said Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so until completion of the trial, subject to the following conditions:

(i) The petitioner shall not leave country without the permission of the Court;

(3 of 3) [CRLMB-6312/2026]

(ii) The petitioner shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected;

(iii) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (BIPIN GUPTA (V. J.)),J 15/JUBIN

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead