Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/6845/2026 of JITENDRA KUMAR S/O SHRI MAHENDRA KUMAR Vs THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 19 June 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6845/2026 Jitendra Kumar S/o Shri Mahendra Kumar, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Kudan Police Station Dadiya, District Sikar (Rajasthan) (At Present Accused Petitioner Is Confined In District Jail Sikar).
[2026:RJ-JP:23425]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6845/2026
Jitendra Kumar S/o Shri Mahendra Kumar, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Kudan Police Station Dadiya, District Sikar (Rajasthan) (At Present Accused Petitioner Is Confined In District Jail Sikar).
----Accused/Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Akshat Chaudhary
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, P.P.
Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP
Mr. Ripu Daman Singh Naruka
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA (V.J.)
Judgment / Order
19/06/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This misc. bail application has been filed by the petitioner Jitendra Kumar S/o Shri Mahendra Kumar, who was arrested by the Police in connection with the FIR bearing No.0019/2026 dated 25.01.2026 registered at Police Station Dadiya, District Sikar for the offences punishable under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 303(2), 324(4), 351(2) and 352 of the B.N.S., 2023.
2. Learned counsel submits that the bail application filed by the petitioner was rejected by the learned Sessions Judge, Sikar vide order dated 29.04.2026, thereafter, the petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of B.N.S.S.
3. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner was not named in the FIR therefore, the allegations levelled in the FIR are not related to him. Learned counsel submits that he has no criminal
[2026:RJ-JP:23425] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-6845/2026] antecedents of any nature in past. In view thereof, learned counsel prays that the petitioner be enlarged on bail.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor as well as the learned counsel for the complainant strongly oppose the bail application.
4. This Court, after considering the fact that the petitioner is not named in the FIR, the allegation cannot be attributed to him, absence of criminal antecedents, the overall facts and circumstances and without commenting upon merits of the matter, is inclined to exercise its power under Section 483 B.N.S.S. and deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.
6. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner Jitendra Kumar S/o Shri Mahendra Kumar shall be released on bail, provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of ₹1,00,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of ₹50,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Court for his appearance before that Court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. The petitioner is further directed not to take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty. It is made clear that the observation as made by this Court in the bail application will not affect the trial of the case. (RAVI CHIRANIA (V.J.)),J 76/Manish