Rajasthan High Court
HC/195/2026 of MAHENDRA CHOUDHARY SON OF SHRI GORDHAN CHOUDHARY Vs THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 10 June 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No. 195/2026 Mahendra Choudhary Son Of Shri Gordhan Choudhary, Aged About 24 Years, Resident Of Ranwon Ki Dhani, Tyonda, Police Thana Sambhar Lake Jaipur Raj. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary,
[2026:RJ-JP:23089-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No. 195/2026
Mahendra Choudhary Son Of Shri Gordhan Choudhary, Aged About 24 Years, Resident Of Ranwon Ki Dhani, Tyonda, Police Thana Sambhar Lake Jaipur Raj.
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
The State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Jaipur, Raj.
2.
The Commissioner Of Police, Jaipur, Raj.
3.
The Additional Director General Of Police, Anti Human Trafficking Unit Jaipur, Raj.
4.
The Superintendent Of Police, Jaipur Rural, Nehru Nagar, R.p.a. Road, Panipech, Jaipur Rajasthan
5.
The Station House Officer, Police Station Sambhar Lake, Jaipur Rural, District Jaipur (Raj).
6.
Dalu Ram Choudhary Son Of Namalum, Resident Of Jatton Ka Mohalla, Khatwadi Kalan, Panchayat Sinodiya, Police Station Sambhar Lake, Jaipur Raj.
7.
Kapil Choudhary Son Of Dalu Ram Choudhary, Resident Of Jatton Ka Mohalla, Khatwadi Kalan, Panchayat Sinodiya, Police Station Sambhar Lake, Jaipur Raj.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Govind Gupta
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA-cum-AAG
with Mr. Aman Agarwal
Ms. Neha Goyal
Mr. Vinod Sharma
Mr. Vijay Yadav, PP
Mr. Jitendar Singh Rathore, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS (V. J.)
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN (V. J.)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
10/06/2026
[2026:RJ-JP:23089-DB] (2 of 2) [HC-195/2026]
1. During the course of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner offered to withdraw this Habeas Corpus Petition.
2. Accordingly, the same is dismissed as withdrawn.
3. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN (V. J.)),J (UMA SHANKER VYAS (V. J.)),J 10/DIPESH - YOGESH