Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/3173/2026 of DILESHWAR S/O VIKRAM MEHER Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 3 June 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3173/2026 Dileshwar S/o Vikram Meher, age 20 Years, R/o Kisdi, Police Station Baloda, District Mahasamund, Chattisgarh. (At present confined in District Jail Sawai Madhopur) ----Accused-applicant Versus
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3173/2026
Dileshwar S/o Vikram Meher, age 20 Years, R/o Kisdi, Police Station Baloda, District Mahasamund, Chattisgarh.
(At present confined in District Jail Sawai Madhopur)
----Accused-applicant
Versus
State of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Non-Applicant
For Applicant(s)
:
Mr. Tarun Jain
Mr. Durgesh Kumar Jangid
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Rajesh Chaudhary, GA-cum-AAG
Ms. Manju Dave, Addl. GA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR
(VACATION JUDGE)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
03/06/2026
1. The present bail application has been filed on behalf of accused-applicant under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S, 2023 against the order dated 05.02.2026 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Sawai Madhopur, in connection with FIR No. 379/2025, registered at Police Station Kotwali Sawai Madhopur, District Sawai Madhpur, for the offences punishable under Sections 318(4), 319(2) of B.N.S., 2023 and Section 66-D of I.T.(Amendment) Act, 2008, by which the bail application of the accused-applicant under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S, 2023 has been dismissed.
2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that the accused-applicant has falsely been implicated in this matter. Learned counsel further submits that the allegation levelled against the accused-applicant is that he has committed cyber
(2 of 3) [CRLMB-3173/2026] fraud by making unauthorized transaction of Rs. 2,08,783/- through credit card of the complainant. Learned counsel also contends that charge-sheet has already been filed against the accused-applicant for the offences punishable under Sections 318(4) & 319(2) of B.N.S. and Sectioin 66-D of I.T. Act and all the offences are triable by Magistrate. Learned counsel also contends that the accused-applicant was arrested on 02.02.2026 and since then, he is behind the bars. Learned counsel further contends that there is no criminal antecedent against the applicant-accused. Learned counsel prays that trial will take long time to conclude, therefore, the accused-applicant be enlarged on bail.
3. On the other hand, learned GA-cum-AAG opposes the bail application.
4. Heard learned counsel for the parties and also perused the material available on record.
5. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the facts that the accused-applicant is 20 years of age and he is behind the bars since 02.02.2026; that the offences levelled against the accused-applicant are triable by the Magistrate; that there is no criminal antecedent against the applicant-accused; that the charge-sheet has been filed and trial will take long time to conclude, but without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, this Court deems it proper to allow the bail application filed on behalf of the accused-applicant.
6. Consequently, this bail application filed under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S, 2023 is allowed. It is ordered that accused-applicant Dileshwar S/o Vikram Meher, arrested in FIR No. 379/2025, registered at Police Station Kotwali Sawai Madhopur, District Sawai
(3 of 3) [CRLMB-3173/2026] Madhopur shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- and two solvent attested sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and, as and when called upon to do so.
7. The accused-applicant is also directed to mark his presence in third week of every month in the concerned Police Station till conclusion of trial. The SHO of the concerned Police Station shall maintain the register of the presence of accused-applicant and shall submit the report in this regard to the concerned trial Court every month.
8. In case of any breach of the above condition, learned counsel for the State shall be free to move an application against the accused-applicant for cancellation of bail before the concerned Judicial Magistrate.
9. Copy of this order also be sent forthwith to the concerned SHO for compliance. (ASHUTOSH KUMAR),V.J. 27/SHAILENDRA SINGHAL