Rajasthan High Court
CW/9838/2026 of RUMAN S/O RAHISH KHAN Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 27 May 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9838/2026 1. Ruman S/o Rahish Khan, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Near Nbgsm College Sohna Ward No. 12 Sohna Gurgaon Hr. Owner Of Truck No. Hr.55.ak.9460. 2. M/s A.k Builders, Through Prop. Asamdeen S/o Asloop Khan Aged About 34
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9838/2026
1.
Ruman S/o Rahish Khan, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Near Nbgsm College Sohna Ward No. 12 Sohna Gurgaon Hr.
Owner Of Truck No. Hr.55.ak.9460.
2.
M/s A.k Builders, Through Prop. Asamdeen S/o Asloop Khan Aged About 34 Year R/o Shop No. 5 Firojpur Road Vill Neemli Teh Tijara Alwar Rj. Owner Of Truck No.
Rj.40.ga.5427.
3.
A.k Dilshan Cont, Through Prop. Irshad S/o Asloop Aged About 35 Year R/o Jhirka Road Nimli Alwar Rj. Owner Of Truck No.rj.40.gb.5155.
4.
Shiv Grit Udyog, Through Prop. Gyanender Yadav S/o Mahavir Singh Aged About 47 Year R/o Village Naurangpur Crusher Zone, Teh Manesar Gurgaon Hr.
Owner Of Truck No. Hr.55.ar.2224. And Hr.55.av.4963.
And Hr.55.av.4246.
5.
Shiv Grit Udyog, Through Prop. Gyanender Yadav S/o Mahavir Singh Aged About 47 Year R/o U/c . Gyanender Yadav R/o 1,vill Nangla Shehjadpur Bharatpur Rajasthan.
Owner Of Truck No. Rj.05.gc.0628. And Rj.05.gc.0627.
6.
Elite Construction, Through Prop. Gyanender Yadav S/o Mahavir Singh Aged About 47 Year R/o U/c . Gyanender Yadav R/o A -73 Hasan Kha Mewati Nagar Vijay Mandir Marg Near Sgst Office Alwar Rajasthan. Owner Of Truck No. Rj.02.gc.5730.
7.
Saddam S/o Fajru, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Lewra Bharatpur Rj. Owner Of Truck Rj.05.gc.0024.
----Petitioners
Versus
1.
State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Transport Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2.
Regional Transport Officer, Sikar.
3.
Regional Transport Officer, Alwar.
4.
District Transport Officer, Kotputali District Jaipur.
5.
Regional Transport Officer, Bharatpur.
(2 of 3)
[CW-9838/2026]
6.
Regional Transport Officer, Beawar.
7.
Regional Transport Officer, Kekri.
8.
Regional Transport Officer, Ajmer.
9.
Regional Trasport Officer, Jhunjhunu.
10.
Regional Trasport Officer, Jaipur First.
11.
Regional Trasport Officer, Jaipur Second
12.
Regional Transport Officer, Bhiwadi.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Jamasi
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. S.S. Naruka, AAG with
Ms. Ritika Naruka, AAAG
Mr. Tanishq Aditya Panwar
Mr. Sachin Singh Rathore, AAAG &
Mr. Anshuman Singh
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
27/05/2026
1. Learned counsel for both the parties are in agreement that the controversy involved in the present matter is squarely covered by the judgments passed by the Co-ordinate Benches of this Court in the matters of Kanwar Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.1 and Mustak & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.2
2. In view of the consensus arrived at between the parties, the impugned order, whereby the Registration Certificates of the vehicles owned / possessed by the petitioners were suspended, needs to be set aside, for the reasons that the petitioners were not afforded the opportunity of hearing and that the said vehicles are the source of bread and butter of the petitioners and their families.
S.B. C.W.P. No.9721/2025
S.B. C.W.P. No.20073/2025
[2026:RJ-JP:22698] (3 of 3) [CW-9838/2026]
3. However, the aforementioned revocation shall only be effective subject to the condition that the petitioners will produce their vehicles before the Transport Department, who will examine and inspect the vehicles’ make and design; and in case any mechanical alteration or overloading is found, a detailed inventory shall be prepared and appropriate orders shall be passed strictly in accordance with law.
4. This arrangement shall be valid only for carrying the vehicles to the respective office of DTO for the aforesaid verification/inspection and shall not authorize the vehicles to ply on the road for any other purpose.
5. The petitioners, along with their vehicle concerned, shall report to / before the respective DTOs who passed the order of suspension of registration of the subject vehicles, on 10.06.2026, preferably between 11:00 A.M. to 01:00 P.M. Thereafter, due reply shall be filed within a period of 15 days by the petitioners.
6. Audience with respect to the same will be provided by the competent authority on 25.06.2026. Adjudication of the same shall be carried out thereafter within a period of 15 days.
7. With the aforesaid observations and directions, the present writ petition stands disposed of.
8. All pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (MANEESH SHARMA),J SOURAV/280