Rajasthan High Court
CW/8516/2026 of SOHAN KAPOOR S/O TEJA RAM KAPOOR Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 27 May 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8516/2026 Sohan Kapoor S/o Teja Ram Kapoor, Aged About 57 Years, Resident Of A82, Jda Colony,ajmer Road, Girdharipura, Jaipur (Rajasthan) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Director General Of Police, Police
[2026:RJ-JP:22658]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8516/2026
Sohan Kapoor S/o Teja Ram Kapoor, Aged About 57 Years, Resident Of A82, Jda Colony,ajmer Road, Girdharipura, Jaipur (Rajasthan)
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
State Of Rajasthan, Through Director General Of Police, Police Directorate, Jaipur Rajasthan.
2.
The Deputy Inspector General Of Police, Commissioner Of Police, Cyber Crime Cell, Jaipur Rajasthan.
3.
The State Bank Of India, Through Its Branch Manager/nodal Officer Rajasthan High Court Jaipur Rajasthan
4.
The Inspector Of Police / Sho Cyber Police Station, Basavara Karnataka
5.
The State Bank Of India, Through Its Branch Manager/
Nodal Officer Basavara Karnataka
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Vishnu Shankar Badaya
For Respondent(s)
:
Ms. Devakriti Vashishtha, AAAG with
Ms. Sunita Meena, AGC for
Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG
Mr. Vibhanshu Sharma for
Ms. Anita Agrawal
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
27/05/2026
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the very outset, seeks liberty to approach the concerned bank for redressal of petitioner’s grievance, more particularly, in light of Clause 10 – Grievance Redressal Mechanism of Section III of the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) dated 02.01.2026 issued by the Ministry of Home Affairs.
2. Taking note of the above limited submission, liberty as prayed for is granted to the petitioner.
[2026:RJ-JP:22658] (2 of 2) [CW-8516/2026]
3. In the event, the petitioner approaches the competent authorities in terms of the said SOP, the concerned authorities of the State and the Bank are directed to ensure that the grievance of the petitioner is duly considered strictly in accordance with the terms as provided in the SOP and within the time-frame prescribed therein. The timeline stipulated under the said SOP shall be mandatorily and strictly adhered to by the concerned authorities.
4. It is made clear that the aforesaid direction has been issued only on the request of the petitioner. The same shall not be construed as an order to address the petitioner's grievance in any particular manner, and the concerned State and Bank authorities shall address the grievance of the petitioner, independently and strictly in accordance with law.
5. With the aforesaid liberty and directions, the writ petition stands disposed of.
6. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
7. However, if even after availing the remedies as provided under the Grievance Redressal Mechanism of the said SOP before the competent authorities, the petitioner’s grievance or cause of action still survives, the petitioner shall be at liberty to avail appropriate legal remedies in accordance with law, if so advised. (MANEESH SHARMA),J RASHMI-253