Rajasthan High Court
CW/9830/2026 of SHREE VEER TEJAJI MOTORS, Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 27 May 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9830/2026 Shree Veer Tejaji Motors, Veer Tejaji Upper Primary School, Narsinghpura, C/o Bheruram, Ward No. 6, Naya Bas, Alwar, Through Proprietor Ramawatar Jat S/o Jay Ram Jat, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Narsinghpura, Bas Dayal,
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9830/2026
Shree Veer Tejaji Motors, Veer Tejaji Upper Primary School, Narsinghpura, C/o Bheruram, Ward No. 6, Naya Bas, Alwar, Through Proprietor Ramawatar Jat S/o Jay Ram Jat, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Narsinghpura, Bas Dayal, Alwar, Rajasthan, Registered Owner Of Vehicle Registration No. Rj 32 Gd 3290
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
State Of Rajasthan, Transport Department Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan, Through Secretary.
2.
Department Of Mining And Geology, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan, Through Joint Secretary.
3.
Commissioner, Transport Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
4.
District Transport Officer, Dto Office Kotputli, District Kotputli-Behror (Rajasthan).
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Sushil Yadav
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. S.S. Naruka, AAG with
Ms. Ritika Naruka, AAAG
Mr. Tanishq Aditya Panwar
Mr. Sachin Singh Rathore, AAAG &
Mr. Anshuman Singh
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
27/05/2026
1. Learned counsel for both the parties are in agreement that the controversy involved in the present matter is squarely covered by the judgments passed by the Co-ordinate Benches of this Court
(2 of 3) [CW-9830/2026] in the matters of Kanwar Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.1 and Mustak & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.2
2. In view of the consensus arrived at between the parties, the impugned order, whereby the Registration Certificates of the vehicle owned / possessed by the petitioner was suspended, needs to be set aside, for the reasons that the petitioner was not afforded the opportunity of hearing and that the said vehicle is the source of bread and butter of the petitioner and his family.
3. However, the aforementioned revocation shall only be effective subject to the condition that the petitioner will produce his vehicle before the Transport Department, who will examine and inspect the vehicle's make and design; and in case any mechanical alteration or overloading is found, a detailed inventory shall be prepared and appropriate orders shall be passed strictly in accordance with law.
4. This arrangement shall be valid only for carrying the vehicle to the respective office of DTO for the aforesaid verification/inspection and shall not authorize the vehicle to ply on the road for any other purpose.
5. The petitioners, along with his vehicle concerned, shall report to / before the respective DTOs who passed the order of suspension of registration of the subject vehicle, on 10.06.2026, preferably between 11:00 A.M. to 01:00 P.M. Thereafter, due reply shall be filed within a period of 15 days by the petitioner.
6. Audience with respect to the same will be provided by the competent authority on 25.06.2026. Adjudication of the same shall be carried out thereafter within a period of 15 days.
S.B. C.W.P. No.9721/2025
S.B. C.W.P. No.20073/2025
[2026:RJ-JP:22696] (3 of 3) [CW-9830/2026]
7. With the aforesaid observations and directions, the present writ petition stands disposed of.
8. All pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (MANEESH SHARMA),J SOURAV/277