Debts Recovery Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals
UCO BANK vs SHYAM DAS on 2 May 2025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 6 Case No. RA/1/2025 IN SA/243/2022 UCO BANK Vs SHYAM DAS Date: 02.05.2025. Proceedings through hybrid mode Present: Smt Santosh Sharma, Counsel for the Applicant This Review application has been filed as counsel submits that in the order it was recorded that consent of both the advocates, whereas the SA was withdrawn by the SA applicant only and the counsel for the bank has given no objections, so it cannot be stated that the consent of both the counsel the matter stands withdrawn.
Counsel for the applicant requested for return of court fee.
As the matter was withdrawn by the SA applicant and the consent was given by the bank. Court fee for RA be returned.
With these directions, RA stands disposed off. All pending IAs also stands disposed off, if any. File be consigned to record as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur