Rajasthan High Court
CRLMP/5440/2020 of SURESH KUMAR SHARMA S/O RICHPAL SHARMA Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 27 May 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 5440/2020 Suresh Kumar Sharma S/o Richpal Sharma, Aged About 73 Years, R/o Ward No. 10, Surajgarh, District Jhunjhunu (Ex- Chairman, Nagar Palika Surajgarh) ----Accused-Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan,
[2026:RJ-JP:22603]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 5440/2020
Suresh Kumar Sharma S/o Richpal Sharma, Aged About 73
Years, R/o Ward No. 10, Surajgarh, District Jhunjhunu (Ex- Chairman, Nagar Palika Surajgarh)
----Accused-Petitioner
Versus
1.
State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor Rajasthan High Court Jaipur Bench, Jaipur.
…...Non-petitioner No.1
2.
Yogesh Kumar Soni S/o Sh. Jugal Kishore Soni, R/o Ward No. 12, Surajgarh, District Jhunjhunu.
3.
Anjali Kumar Kataria S/o Gajanand Kataria, R/o Ward No.
8, Surajgarh, District Jhunjhunu.
----Complainants Non-petitioner Nos.2 and 3
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Kapil Gupta along with
Mr. Jai Sharma
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Sudesh Saini, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
27/05/2026
1. The instant criminal misc. petition has been filed by the petitioner with a prayer to quash F.I.R. No.310/2017, registered at OP ACB, Jhunjhunu Police Station with Head Police Station, Anti Corruption Bureau, Jaipur and so also the charge-sheet submitted by the Investigating Agency.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cognizance has already been taken against the petitioner vide order dated 09.01.2026 and the petitioner by filing a criminal
[2026:RJ-JP:22603] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-5440/2020] revision petition, has challenged the order of cognizance before the Court.
3. After arguing at some length, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to raise all his objections and credentials while arguing the revision petition and also before the appropriate court at appropriate stage.
4. In view of the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant criminal misc. petition is disposed of with liberty as prayed by him.
5. The stay application and pending application, if any, also stand disposed of. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J 40/ARTI SHARMA