Rajasthan High Court
CCP/786/2026 of LAXMAN SINGH NARUKA S/O BHANWAR SINGH, Vs DR. SHRI JOGA RAM, on 27 May 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 786/2026 Laxman Singh Naruka S/o Bhanwar Singh, Aged About 62 Years, R/o Village Pachala, Panchayat Samiti Phagi, Tehsil Phagi, District Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Dr. Shri Joga Ram, Principal Secretary, Panchayati
[2026:RJ-JP:22460]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 786/2026
Laxman Singh Naruka S/o Bhanwar Singh, Aged About 62 Years, R/o Village Pachala, Panchayat Samiti Phagi, Tehsil Phagi, District Jaipur.
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
Dr. Shri Joga Ram, Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (302005).
2.
Shru Sandesh Nayak, District Collector Jaipur, District
(302016).
3.
Shri Rakesh Chaudhary, Sub Divisional Officer, Phagi, District Jaipur (303005).
4.
Smt. Neelam Mittal, Tehsildar, Phagi, District Jaipur
(303005).
5.
Shri Charan Singh Chaudhary, Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Phagi, District Jaipur (303005).
6.
Shri Shivraj Singh, Village Development Officer, Gram Panchayat Pachala, Panchayat Samiti Phagi, District Jaipur
(303005).
7.
Shri Rajesh Verma, Station House Officer, Police Station Phagi, District Jaipur (303005).
8.
Mohan Singh S/o Shardul Singh, R/o Village Pachala, Tehsil Phagi, District Jaipur (303005).
9.
Dilip Singh S/o Mohan Singh, R/o Village Pachala, Tehsil Phagi, District Jaipur (303005).
10.
Ravindra Singh S/o Mohan Singh, R/o Village Pachala, Tehsil Phagi, District Jaipur (303005).
11.
State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (302005).
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Laxmi Kant, Adv.
For Respondent(s)
:
[2026:RJ-JP:22460]
(2 of 2)
[CCP-786/2026]
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
27/05/2026 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this contempt petition. Permission sought for is granted. In view of above, this contempt petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of. (ANAND SHARMA),J DIVYA /198