Rajasthan High Court
CW/9699/2026 of SURENDRA SHARMA S/O LATE SHRI SHYAM LAL SHARMA Vs THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE on 26 May 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9699/2026 Surendra Sharma S/o Late Shri Shyam Lal Sharma, Aged About 60 Years, R/o 8/359, Vidhyadhar Nagar, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The Director General Of Police, Police Head Quarter, Lal Kothi, Jaipur 2. The
[2026:RJ-JP:22334]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9699/2026
Surendra Sharma S/o Late Shri Shyam Lal Sharma, Aged About 60 Years, R/o 8/359, Vidhyadhar Nagar, Jaipur.
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
The Director General Of Police, Police Head Quarter, Lal Kothi, Jaipur
2.
The Principal Secretary, Department Of Personnel, Government Secretariate, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Tarun Jaiman
For Respondent(s)
:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
26/05/2026
1. In the instant writ petition, petitioner has impugned the memorandum of charge-sheet dated 23.02.2026, fundamentally on the ground that same has been issued after retirement of petitioner, that too without seeking permission from the Hon’ble Governor as required under Rule 7 of the Rajasthan Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1996.
2. In addition, petitioner has also raised a grievance that departmental proceedings, pursuant to charge-sheet, may not be continued parallel and simultaneous to the criminal trial, in respect of the similar nature of charges, however, no such prayer has been made by petitioner in the instant writ petition.
[2026:RJ-JP:22334] (2 of 2) [CW-9699/2026]
3. In that view, counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file a fresh petition with appropriate pleadings and prayers.
4. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
5. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J pcg/144