Rajasthan High Court

CRLMP/1678/2017 of SMT DHAPLI AND ORS Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ANR on 26 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1678/2017 1. Smt. Dhapli Wife Of Panna Ram, R/o Dhani Johad Wali, Tehsil Neemkathana, District Sikar Raj. 2. Hoshiyari Lal Son Of Panna Ram, R/o Dhani Johad Wali, Tehsil Neemkathana, District Sikar Raj. 3.

[2026:RJ-JP:22359]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1678/2017

1.

Smt. Dhapli Wife Of Panna Ram, R/o Dhani Johad Wali, Tehsil Neemkathana, District Sikar Raj.

2.

Hoshiyari Lal Son Of Panna Ram, R/o Dhani Johad Wali, Tehsil Neemkathana, District Sikar Raj.

3.

Surendra Son Of Panna Ram, R/o Dhani Johad Wali, Tehsil Neemkathana, District Sikar Raj.

4.

Subhash Son Of Panna Ram, R/o Dhani Johad Wali, Tehsil Neemkathana, District Sikar Raj.

----Accused-Petitioners

Versus

1.

State Of Rajasthan Through P.P.

----Respondent

2.

Sita Ram Son Of Shri Ganpat Ram, R/o Bheelon Ki Navodi, Tan Mandhala Bhopalpura, Village Guhala, Tehsil Neemkathana, District Sikar Raj.

----Complainant-Respondent

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Ajay Gupta,

Ms. Shivani Soni

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. Sudesh Saini, P.P.

Mr. Namo Narayan Meena, for

Mr. Harendra Singh

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Order

26/05/2026

1. Learned counsels appearing for the respective parties submit that both the parties, i.e., the accused-petitioner and the complainant, have entered into a compromise and they may be permitted to submit the same before the concerned Magistrate, before whom the police, after completion of the investigation, has submitted the closure report.

[2026:RJ-JP:22359] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-1678/2017]

2. In view of the limited prayer made by the learned counsels appearing for both the parties, this criminal miscellaneous petition is disposed of with liberty to the parties to submit the compromise before the concerned Magistrate, if arrived in between them.

3. pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J 17/SHRUTI SHARMA

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead