Rajasthan High Court

CW/2592/2026 of RAJENDRA PRASAD SHARMA SON OF SHRI YADI RAM Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 26 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2592/2026 Rajendra Prasad Sharma Son Of Shri Yadi Ram, Aged About 56 Years, Resident Of 200, In Front Of Mandir, Barouli, District Dholpur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, School Education

[2026:RJ-JP:22271]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2592/2026

Rajendra Prasad Sharma Son Of Shri Yadi Ram, Aged About 56

Years, Resident Of 200, In Front Of Mandir, Barouli, District Dholpur.

----Petitioner

Versus

1.

State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, School Education Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.

2.

Director, Elementary Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Bikaner.

3.

District Education Officer, Elementary (Headquarters), Dholpur.

4.

Secretary, Gram Panchayat Barauli, Panchayat Samiti, Kekri, District Dholpur.

5.

Principal, Government Senior Secondary School, Barauli, Block Sar Mathura, District Dholpur.

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Dilip Singh Kurka

For Respondent(s)

:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Order

26/05/2026

1. Petitioner was appointed as a School Assistant (Vidhyalay Sahayak) under the Rajasthan Contractual Hiring to Civil Posts Rules, 2022, and on account of filing of a charge-sheet against him in connection with FIR No.219/2025 registered at Police Station Saramthura for offences under Sections 74 and 351(2) of BNS, 2023 and Sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act, his services have been dispensed with vide order dated 12.09.2025 by the Principal, Government Senior Secondary School, Barauli,

[2026:RJ-JP:22271] (2 of 2) [CW-2592/2026] Saramthura, District Dholpur, whereagainst petitioner has preferred this writ petition.

2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the FIR in question has been falsely lodged and there is likelihood of mutual settlement between the parties. Therefore, he prays for withdrawal of the present writ petition at this stage, with liberty to file afresh in case the FIR/ charge-sheet is quashed by the Court.

3. Permission is granted.

4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn at this stage, with the liberty as prayed for.

5. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J Sachin Sharma/17

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead