Rajasthan High Court
/7920/2026 of RAHUL BAIRWA @ R.K. @ KALU BAIRWA S/O BANSHILAL Vs THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 22 May 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Second Bail Application No. 7920/2026 Rahul Bairwa @ R.k. @ Kalu Bairwa S/o Banshilal, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Village Lasoda, Tehsil Khandar, Police Station Kha- jna Doongari, District Sawai Madhopur, Presently House No. 64,
[2026:RJ-JP:21865]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Second Bail Application No.
7920/2026
Rahul Bairwa @ R.k. @ Kalu Bairwa S/o Banshilal, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Village Lasoda, Tehsil Khandar, Police Station Kha- jna Doongari, District Sawai Madhopur, Presently House No. 64, Mahaveer Nagar- Ii, Police Station Shipra Path, Jaipur. (Presently Confined In District Jail, Jaipur).
----Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Jai Kishan Yogi
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Sudesh Saini, P.P. with
Mr. Navdeep Singh
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
22/05/2026
1. The second bail application has been filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of accused-petitioner in connection with FIR No. 84/2025 registered at Police Station Transport Nagar (Jaipur City (East)), District Jaipur City (East) for offence under Sections 115(2), 126(2) and 308(2) of B.N.S., 2023. The first bail application was dismissed vide order dated 27.01.2026.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the charges for offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2) and 308(2) of B.N.S., 2023 have been framed against the accused-petitioner on 11.02.2026 and thereafter not a single [2026:RJ-JP:21865] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-7920/2026] witness has been examined so far. He further submits that accused-petitioner is in custody since 04.10.2025.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application.
4. Taking into consideration the allegations against the accused-petitioner who is aged about 19 years and so also the fact that even after passing of more than three months of framing of charges not even a single witness has been examined, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits or demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.
5. Accordingly, the second bail application is allowed and it is directed that the accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided that he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lax Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/-(Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court or any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J 9/SHRUTI SHARMA