Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/7121/2026 of SANTOSH S/O BHANWARLAL Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 22 May 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Third Bail Application No. 7121/2026 Santosh S/o Bhanwarlal, Aged About 58 Years, R/o Ward No 13, Phoolpura, Police Station Sanharangpur, Distt. Rajgarh (Madhya Pradesh) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail
[2026:RJ-JP:21863]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Third Bail Application No.
7121/2026
Santosh S/o Bhanwarlal, Aged About 58 Years, R/o Ward No 13, Phoolpura, Police Station Sanharangpur, Distt. Rajgarh (Madhya Pradesh) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Malpura)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Ms. Raj Bala
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, P.P. with
Mr. Navdeep Singh
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
22/05/2026
1. The third bail application has been filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of accused-petitioner in connection with FIR No. 127/2025 registered at Police Station Lambaharisingh, District Tonk for offences punishable under Sections 3, 5, 6 and 8 of Rajasthan Bovine Animal (Prohibition of Slaughter And Regulation of Temporary Migration of Export) Act, 1995 and under Section 11(1)(D) of the Prevention of Cruelty To Animal Act, 1960.
2. Heard.
3. Considered the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner as well as learned public prosecutor and perused the
[2026:RJ-JP:21863] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-7121/2026] challan papers and statements of the witnesses recorded before the trial Court.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 09.11.2025 and trial of the case is likely to take considerable time to conclude, therefore, the accused-petitioner may be released on bail.
5. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.
6. Having regard to the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner and taking into consideration the allegation against the present accused-petitioner and the fact that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 09.11.2025, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits or demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused- petitioner on bail.
7. Accordingly, the third bail application is allowed and it is directed that the accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided that he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lax Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/-(Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court or any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J 4/SHRUTI SHARMA