Rajasthan High Court
CW/5523/2026 of MANAGING COMMITTEE SAINI SENIOR SECONDARY SCHOOL Vs SMT. KIRAN SAINI W/O SHRI LOKESH KUMAR SAINI, on 21 May 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5523/2026 1. Managing Committee Saini Senior Secondary School, Alwar, Rajasthan Through Its Secretary. 2. Managing Committee, Saini Shiksha Samiti, Manu Marg, Alwar, Rajasthan Through Its Secretary. ----Petitioners Versus 1.
[2026:RJ-JP:21617]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5523/2026
1.
Managing Committee Saini Senior Secondary School, Alwar, Rajasthan Through Its Secretary.
2.
Managing Committee, Saini Shiksha Samiti, Manu Marg, Alwar, Rajasthan Through Its Secretary.
----Petitioners
Versus
1.
Smt. Kiran Saini W/o Shri Lokesh Kumar Saini, Aged About 69 Years, R/o Manu Marg, Naya Bas Ka Choraha (Tiwari Clinic Ke Samne), Alwar.
2.
Director/commissioner, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner (Raj.).
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Ms. Deepika Jalendra for
Mr. Amit Jindal
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Pawan Jandu for
Mr. Sumer Singh Ola
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
21/05/2026
1. Managing Committee, Saini Senior Secondary School, Alwar, preferred this writ petition, assailing the order dated 23.01.2026 passed by the Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate No.1, Alwar in the execution proceedings No.36/07/18, commenced by respondents in respect of the judgment dated 20.11.2017, passed by the Rajasthan Non Governmental Educational Institutions Tribunal in his favour.
2. Counsel for the petitioners states that both parties have mutually settled the dispute of arrears. Hence, in that view,
[2026:RJ-JP:21617] (2 of 2) [CW-5523/2026] counsel for the petitioners does not want to pursue this writ petition on merits.
3. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
4. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J pcg/10