Rajasthan High Court
CW/9046/2026 of BABULAL SON OF SHRI NAINU RAMJI MEENA Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 20 May 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9046/2026 Babulal Son of Shri Nainu Ramji Meena, Aged About 39 Years, Resident of Village Abhaypura, Post Palawala Jatan, Tehsil Bassi, District Jaipur, Rajasthan ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan, Through Principal
[2026:RJ-JP:21275]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9046/2026
Babulal Son of Shri Nainu Ramji Meena, Aged About 39 Years, Resident of Village Abhaypura, Post Palawala Jatan, Tehsil Bassi, District Jaipur, Rajasthan
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
State of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Tribal Area Development Department, Government of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Bhagwandas Road, Jaipur
2.
Commissioner, Tribal Area Development Department, Government of Rajasthan, Udaipur, 1, Saheli Marg, Chetak Circle, Udaipur, Rajasthan
3.
Director Swach Project, Near Police Anveshan Bhawan, Badi Road, Hawala Khurd, Udaipur
4.
Project Manager, Near Police Anveshan Bhawan, Badi Road, Hawala Khurd, Udaipur
5.
Project Officer, Swach Jaipur, Tribal House, Second Floor, Near Jawahar Circle Police Station, Jaipur
6.
Bimalraj Outsourcing Pvt Ltd, Gurugram, Haryana
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Ms. Kiran Mishra for
Mr. Ashok Mishra
For Respondent(s)
:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
20/05/2026
1. Instant writ petition has been filed by petitioner, challenging the letter dated 24.04.2026 issued by the respondent No.6 to respondent No.2 whereby petitioner was directed to be relieved from the post of Chief Coordinator, Dausa.
2. Counsel for petitioner, having instructions from petitioner and in view of the subsequent fact that he has been terminated from service and does not want to pursue this writ petition and seeks permission to withdraw the same.
3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
4. Stay application and other pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J NITIN/19