Rajasthan High Court
CW/9010/2026 of SURENDRA SINGH SON OF SHRI ARJUN SINGH Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 20 May 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9010/2026 Surendra Singh Son of Shri Arjun Singh, Aged About 42 Years, Constable No. 4576 (Dismissed), Reserve Police Line Jaipur, Resident of Plot No. 50, Shri Nath Colony, Hotel Airport Q Ke Samne Airport Terminal 1,
[2026:RJ-JP:21242]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9010/2026
Surendra Singh Son of Shri Arjun Singh, Aged About 42 Years, Constable No. 4576 (Dismissed), Reserve Police Line Jaipur, Resident of Plot No. 50, Shri Nath Colony, Hotel Airport Q Ke Samne Airport Terminal 1, Sanganer, Jaipur (Rajasthan).
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
State of Rajasthan, Through Director General of Police, Police Headquarter, Lalkothi, Jaipur
2.
Commissioner of Police, Police Commissionerate, Jaipur
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Sudhir Gupta
Mr. Parth Gupta
For Respondent(s)
:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
20/05/2026
1. In the instant writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner has assailed his order of punishment dated 22.12.2025 whereby he dismissed from his service, whereagainst counsel for petitioner admits during course of arguments that petitioner has already preferred a Departmental Appeal and same is pending consideration.
2. In view of pendency of the Departmental Appeal against the punishment order, filing of this writ petition is misplaced and unwarranted at this stage, therefore, counsel for petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to pursue the Departmental Appeal against the impugned order of punishment.
3. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of with liberty as prayed for.
4. Stay application and other pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J NITIN/16