Debts Recovery Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals
STATE BANK OF INDIA vs HEER SINGH on 16 May 2025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
cm Item No. 117 Case No. APPEAL/8/2023 IN OA/1344/2019 STATE BANK OF INDIA Vs HEER SINGH Date: 16.05.2025. Proceedings through hybrid mode Present: Shri Kirti Kapoor & Shri Jabhar Swami, Counsel for the Applicant Shri Kailash Tailor, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
In this matter, this Appeal is filed against the order passed by the Recovery Officer allowing the objections made by the third party objector, being the owner of the flat in question.
The main contention counsel for the appellant is that this Appeal is maintainable and if there is any grievance of respondent then, they should have gone under Section 26 RDB Act for modification of recovery certificate. Section 11 of Income tax schedule gives power to the Recovery Officer to entertain objections of third party to adjudicate the rights to objections after making thorough investigation.
Very interestingly, State Bank of India is claiming charge over this property which is not even registered in CERSAI and no mortgage was created.
On the other hand, the defendant herein is also a borrower of State Bank of India only. Which has made a proper investigation before granting loan and also service registration has been done. Recovery Officer cannot go beyond the recovery certificate when the certified debtors are before him objecting to the amount or any averment in respect of the property mentioned therein, but under Rule 11, it is the duty of the Recovery Officer to investigate and pass appropriate order.
Court of the Presiding Officer cm
It is admitted that the property is not mortgaged with the appellant herein and no charge is registered with CERSAI.
In view of the above submissions and contentions, this Appeal stands dismissed.
Accordingly, Appeal stands disposed off, all pending IAs also stands disposed off, if any. File be consigned to record as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer