Rajasthan High Court
CW/748/2024 of NARESH KUMAR SHARMA S/O RAMESHWAR DAYAL SHARMA Vs THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 19 May 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 748/2024 Naresh Kumar Sharma S/o Rameshwar Dayal Sharma, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Village Bhangdoli, Tehsil Thanagazi, District Alwar (Raj). ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Rajasthan through Its Principal Secretary,
[2026:RJ-JP:21131]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 748/2024
Naresh Kumar Sharma S/o Rameshwar Dayal Sharma, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Village Bhangdoli, Tehsil Thanagazi, District Alwar (Raj).
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
The State of Rajasthan through Its Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur
2.
The Director, Medical And Health Services, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilakmarg, C-Scheme, Jaipur (Raj.)
3.
Chief Medical and Health Officer, Sector 7, Alwar, Rajasthan.
4.
Block Chief Medical Officer, Thanagazi, District Alwar (Raj.).
5.
Community Health Center Incharge Cum Secretary Medicare Relief Society, Government Community Health Center, Pratapgarh, Block Thanagazi, District Alwar, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Sudhir Yadav
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
19/05/2026
1. Instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, feeling aggrieved by removal of his services from the post of Laboratory Assistant posted at CHC Pratapgarh on contract basis as also non-release of his salary from July, 2022.
[2026:RJ-JP:21131] (2 of 2) [CW-748/2024]
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with passage of time, the prayer made in the instant writ petition has become infructuous.
3. Accordingly, instant petition is dismissed as rendered infructuous.
4. Stay application and any other pending application, if any, stand disposed of (SUDESH BANSAL),J NITIN/81